- From: Clark C. Evans <cce@clarkevans.com>
- Date: Mon, 29 May 2000 20:57:19 -0400 (EDT)
- To: John Cowan <cowan@locke.ccil.org>
- cc: michaelm@netsol.com, xml-uri@w3.org
On Mon, 29 May 100, John Cowan wrote: > > Michael Mealling scripsit: > > > The 'backward compatibility argument' doesn't hold much > > water with me... How many applications actually depend on this change? > > If it isn't in the hundreds of thousands then I don't really care.... > > Feh. You are willing, then, to dishonor your word, provided only a > few persons who relied on it are "inconvenienced" thereby? Remind me > never to call *you* as a witness for anything. > > By issuing a Recommendation, the W3C as an organization pledged its word. Admiting a mistake should not bring dishonor. Clark
Received on Monday, 29 May 2000 20:53:06 UTC