On Mon, 29 May 100, John Cowan wrote: > > Michael Mealling scripsit: > > > The 'backward compatibility argument' doesn't hold much > > water with me... How many applications actually depend on this change? > > If it isn't in the hundreds of thousands then I don't really care.... > > Feh. You are willing, then, to dishonor your word, provided only a > few persons who relied on it are "inconvenienced" thereby? Remind me > never to call *you* as a witness for anything. > > By issuing a Recommendation, the W3C as an organization pledged its word. Admiting a mistake should not bring dishonor. ClarkReceived on Monday, 29 May 2000 20:53:06 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:32:43 UTC