W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-uri@w3.org > May 2000

Re: RDF namespace conventions

From: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>
Date: Mon, 22 May 2000 20:42:29 -0500
Message-Id: <200005230033.UAA1046122@smtp1.mail.iamworld.net>
To: xml-uri@w3.org
At 06:04 PM 2000-05-22 -0400, W. E. Perry wrote:

> I do not see that the apparent agreement here requires the one-and-only-one 
> choice offered on the 'call the question' thread. Is that in fact the 
> understanding of, at least, the participants in this thread?

Yes, it is the understanding of at least this participant in this thread.

On the other hand, you can now find the same basic idea in that other
thread in


http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xml-uri/2000May/0388.html

..where Simon points out

>... XML parsers aren't expected to understand the information they process, 
> just make sure that it conforms to a basic set of rules.

Al

>Walter Perry
>
>
>"Simon St.Laurent" wrote:
>
>> There only needs to be enmity when higher-level layers begin insisting on
>> changes in lower levels, which cannot be easily justified at those lower
>> levels and which may have effects on other applications built using a
>> different set of upper layers.
> 
Received on Monday, 22 May 2000 20:31:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:32:42 UTC