- From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
- Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 22:33:15 -0400
- To: <xml-uri@w3.org>
Thanks for the nice summary. After careful consideration, and my initial inkling that absolutization was the way to go, I now conclude that the current namespace spec is correct and that namespace URIs ***including relative URIs*** ought be compared literally (char-by-char). This is most consistent with other URI usage where 'path' normalization is done at the server's discression though the URIs themselves are not 'identical' e.g. http://www.x.com/a/./b/c and http://www.x.com/a/b/c are not identical URIs though resolve to the same content/document on most servers. Usage of relative URIs will have the well identified pitfalls. So be it. You makes your choices you gets your consequences. If anyone cares (or is counting) that is my final vote :-)) Jonathan Borden
Received on Tuesday, 23 May 2000 22:45:41 UTC