- From: Rick JELLIFFE <ricko@geotempo.com>
- Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 23:15:08 +0800
- To: xml-uri@w3.org
> Re: Terminology: `absolutization' is vile > > From: Sam Hunting (sam_hunting@yahoo.com) > Date: Thu, May 18 2000 > > *Next message: David Hunter: "URLs for Namespaces: I don't buy it" > > * Previous message: David Carlisle: "Re: Toward the self-describing web [was: Irony heaped on irony]" > * Maybe in reply to: Paul W. Abrahams: "Terminology: `absolutization' is vile" > * Next in thread: John Cowan: "Re: Terminology: `absolutization' is vile" > * Next in thread: David Carlisle: "Re: Use cases" > * Next in thread: Michael Rys: "RE: Use cases" > * Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] > * Other mail archives: [this mailing list] [other W3C mailing lists] > * Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ] > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > Message-ID: <20000518170829.10427.qmail@web3004.mail.yahoo.com> > Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 10:08:29 -0700 (PDT) > From: Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com> > Subject: Re: Terminology: `absolutization' is vile "Fully resolved" is good. "Complete" would be good too. "Absolutization" is ugly. Rick Jelliffe
Received on Tuesday, 23 May 2000 11:06:47 UTC