W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-uri@w3.org > May 2000

Re: Terminology: `absolutization' is vile

From: Rick JELLIFFE <ricko@geotempo.com>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 23:15:08 +0800
Message-ID: <392AA07C.5BE7B6C7@geotempo.com>
To: xml-uri@w3.org
> Re: Terminology: `absolutization' is vile
> 
> From: Sam Hunting (sam_hunting@yahoo.com)
> Date: Thu, May 18 2000
> 
> *Next message: David Hunter: "URLs for Namespaces: I don't buy it"
> 
>    * Previous message: David Carlisle: "Re: Toward the self-describing web [was: Irony heaped on irony]"
>    * Maybe in reply to: Paul W. Abrahams: "Terminology: `absolutization' is vile"
>    * Next in thread: John Cowan: "Re: Terminology: `absolutization' is vile"
>    * Next in thread: David Carlisle: "Re: Use cases"
>    * Next in thread: Michael Rys: "RE: Use cases"
>    * Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
>    * Other mail archives: [this mailing list] [other W3C mailing lists]
>    * Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
> 
>   ------------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> Message-ID: <20000518170829.10427.qmail@web3004.mail.yahoo.com>
> Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 10:08:29 -0700 (PDT)
> From: Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com>
> Subject: Re: Terminology: `absolutization' is vile

"Fully resolved" is good. "Complete" would be good too. 
"Absolutization" is ugly.

Rick Jelliffe
Received on Tuesday, 23 May 2000 11:06:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:32:42 UTC