- From: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>
- Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 11:52:57 -0500
- To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>, xml-uri@w3.org
At 10:57 AM 2000-05-18 -0400, Simon St.Laurent wrote: >At 11:04 AM 5/18/00 -0500, Al Gilman wrote: >>The definition of packaging I am using is the creation of portable >>super-documents. >> >>Using relative URI bindings between documents in a local address subtree in >>effect creates a portable super-document. Because it performs this central >>function of packaging I termed it "virtual packaging." > >So in this case the document _is_ its own package? I would prefer to say the document, together with any documents on whose relative location it depends, such as schemas referenced using relative URIs, constitutes the package. Al > >Simon St.Laurent >XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed. >Building XML Applications >Inside XML DTDs: Scientific and Technical >Cookies / Sharing Bandwidth >http://www.simonstl.com >
Received on Thursday, 18 May 2000 11:42:32 UTC