W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-uri@w3.org > May 2000

Re: looking for packaging, not a schema (-NOT, counterproposal)

From: Al Gilman <asgilman@iamdigex.net>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 11:52:57 -0500
Message-Id: <200005181543.LAA1927524@smtp2.mail.iamworld.net>
To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>, xml-uri@w3.org
At 10:57 AM 2000-05-18 -0400, Simon St.Laurent wrote:
>At 11:04 AM 5/18/00 -0500, Al Gilman wrote:
>>The definition of packaging I am using is the creation of portable
>>super-documents. 
>>
>>Using relative URI bindings between documents in a local address subtree in
>>effect creates a portable super-document.  Because it performs this central
>>function of packaging I termed it "virtual packaging."  
>
>So in this case the document _is_ its own package?

I would prefer to say the document, together with any documents on whose
relative location it depends, such as schemas referenced using relative
URIs, constitutes the package.

Al

>
>Simon St.Laurent
>XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed.
>Building XML Applications
>Inside XML DTDs: Scientific and Technical
>Cookies / Sharing Bandwidth
>http://www.simonstl.com
> 
Received on Thursday, 18 May 2000 11:42:32 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:32:42 UTC