At 11:51 AM 2000-05-22 -0400, Tim Berners-Lee wrote: > >So, the layer separation you suggest would work only with either >(a) no relative URIs -- at least a warning that XML lower layers don't grok >them, or >(b) change lower layers to absolutize before comparing. > >Either of these would be consistent. The second would be cleaner. > Cleaner product, dirtier process. [Personal opinion: not enough cleaner product to warrant the process breakage.] (a) under the 'warning' interpretation (NOT "no relative") might seem to be the most-broadly-agreeable way to move ahead. We haven't taken a fresh straw poll in this group to be sure. AlReceived on Monday, 22 May 2000 15:19:57 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:13:58 UTC