- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
- Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 11:09:38 -0400
- To: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, "xml-uri@w3.org" <xml-uri@w3.org>
Tim Berners-Lee wrote: > I don't see that you gain anything by this over just banning relative URIs. What you gain, *sigh*, is victory over the Moral Problem, which you seem to insist on treating as negligible. You partition namespace names into two forms, Absolute URI (with optional fragment-id) and Other String. Other String names are legal, but deprecated; they are not allowed to play in the Brave New Namespace URI World. Users who have created documents with Other String namespaces still get to do everything the (1998) Namespace Rec allowed, however, namely compare them for equality. They are *not* left to twist slowly, slowly in the wind. -- Schlingt dreifach einen Kreis um dies! || John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com> Schliesst euer Aug vor heiliger Schau, || http://www.reutershealth.com Denn er genoss vom Honig-Tau, || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan Und trank die Milch vom Paradies. -- Coleridge (tr. Politzer)
Received on Friday, 19 May 2000 11:09:50 UTC