- From: Jonathan Marsh <jmarsh@microsoft.com>
- Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 13:58:06 -0700
- To: "'John Cowan'" <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
- Cc: xml-uri@w3.org
John Cowan wrote: > it remains both well-formed and namespace-valid > (yes, I know > that term is not defined anywhere). I offer a working term "namespace-well-formed" which means both well-formed according to XML 1.0 and compliant to Namespaces in XML. I expect that when namespaces are rolled into XML, the term "well-formed" will expand to cover "namespace-well-formed". To restate using this new term: I'm worried about making the namespace-well-formededness of an XML document dependent upon its context.
Received on Thursday, 25 May 2000 17:15:55 UTC