John Cowan wrote: > it remains both well-formed and namespace-valid > (yes, I know > that term is not defined anywhere). I offer a working term "namespace-well-formed" which means both well-formed according to XML 1.0 and compliant to Namespaces in XML. I expect that when namespaces are rolled into XML, the term "well-formed" will expand to cover "namespace-well-formed". To restate using this new term: I'm worried about making the namespace-well-formededness of an XML document dependent upon its context.Received on Thursday, 25 May 2000 17:15:55 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:32:42 UTC