- From: Liam Quin <liam@holoweb.net>
- Date: Sat, 27 May 2000 15:43:56 -0400
- To: xml-uri@w3.org
Paul W. Abrahams wrote: >John Cowan wrote: >> Liam Quin scripsit: >> >> > Finally, it would make sense to abandon the idea of having a URI in there >> > at all, and use a formally defined name, preferably one that does not >> > start with "http:" in any examples :-) >> >> Then you lose the advantage of leveraging the existing infrastructure >> to help you assign a unique name. Not true (as I have said) > True. But that leverage may come at too high a price. If you want a URI, you'd better define what's at the end of it. If you want a name, use a name. Lee -- Liam Quin - Barefoot in Toronto - liam@holoweb.net - http://www.holoweb.net/ Ankh on irc.sorcery.net http://valinor.sorcery.net/ Co-author, The XML Specification Guide, Wiley, 1999 Forthcoming: The Open Source XML Database Toolkit
Received on Saturday, 27 May 2000 15:43:57 UTC