W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-uri@w3.org > May 2000

Re: Web Architecture, 'XML Autonomy'

From: Sam Hunting <sam_hunting@yahoo.com>
Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 11:40:31 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <20000524184031.3836.qmail@web3004.mail.yahoo.com>
To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>, xml-uri@w3.org
> At 11:58 AM 5/23/00 -0400, Tim Berners-Lee wrote:
> >The "Web Architecture" is a set of invariants, a set of assumptions
> >which one can distill from the decisions which have been made 
> >historically and which we find have to be assumed implicitly within
> >the web development commuity. My personal attempt represent these is
> >at http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Architecture and has been for 10
> >years. [...] The architecture is not unquestionable.
> >But some of it is the assumption on which people joined the
> >consortium.  WhatI would like is (current personal thinking) was
> >an ethos in which some documents represened the best stab at
> >capturing the nominal important invariants at any one point, and a
> >group within W3C or near neighbors would be expected to be aware
> >of it and, if it wanted to go outside it, to negotiate it in a wider
> context than just itself

Surely it cannot be that W3C recommendations, at least some of which
are intended to be cited as "normative", are all dependent for their
interpretation and implementation on documents derived from such an
informal process?

And surely it cannot be the case that the "assumptions" people make
when they join the W3C should affect the plain meaning of published

If such is in fact the case, shouldn't current W3C Recommendations be
amended to reflect the "super-normative" status of the "Web

Sam Hunting

<? "To imagine a language is to imagine a form of life."
    -- Ludwig Wittgenstein, Philosophical Investigations ?>

Do You Yahoo!?
Kick off your party with Yahoo! Invites.
Received on Wednesday, 24 May 2000 14:41:03 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:13:58 UTC