Dan wrote: >here's an example ... >The namespace spec says that they have the same namespace >name: "../2000/vocab#" ... >That's broken, no? ... >The only answer that I can see that's consistent with >both the XPath implementations and Web Architecture is: "don't do that." I agree pretty completely with Dan's line of argument and his conclusion. I don't agree with his technique of arguing on the basis of The Great Web Architecture In The Sky, since there are obvious disagreements about what's in TGWAITS. But you don't have to believe in Dan's version of TGWAITS to agree that his example illustrates obvious breakage in terms of common engineering sense. Damn, this discussion has gone on a long time. Does anyone see any symptom of minds meeting? -TimReceived on Thursday, 18 May 2000 11:50:35 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:13:58 UTC