W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-uri@w3.org > May 2000

RE: Use cases

From: David E. Cleary <davec@progress.com>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 14:24:53 -0400
To: <xml-uri@w3.org>
Message-ID: <NDBBIOBPAGDGFJAHFCGGKENECBAA.davec@progress.com>
> Other than fulfilling a dream of consistency, I can't see any good reason
> to support relative URIs in namespaces - ever.

Whether there is a good reason or not, the fact is that there are documents
out there that adhere to the current specification that you would turn
invalid by your edict. I could not support this unless XML in its entirty is
reved to version 1.1.

David Cleary
Progress Software
Received on Tuesday, 16 May 2000 14:26:12 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:32:42 UTC