- From: Pawson, David <David.Pawson@rnib.org.uk>
- Date: Fri, 19 May 2000 09:41:13 +0100
- To: xml-uri@w3.org
David Megginson >We have two >fundamentally different kinds of things -- the Namespace (or package >name, if you prefer), which should change rarely, if at all, and the >schema, which may change frequently, so each should be referenced with >a different mechanism. = a name, no address implied. >XML schemas should allow *only* the xsi:schemaLocation attribute and >no other mechanism, and the WG should set the example by using that >attribute itself. = an address, from which I can reasonably expect to obtain something. I'd buy that. Regards, DaveP
Received on Friday, 19 May 2000 04:34:52 UTC