W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-uri@w3.org > May 2000

Re: Irony heaped on irony

From: <keshlam@us.ibm.com>
Date: Thu, 25 May 2000 13:07:37 -0400
To: John Aldridge <john.aldridge@informatix.co.uk>
cc: "David Brownell" <david-b@pacbell.net>, xml-dev@xml.org, xml-uri@w3.org
Message-ID: <852568EA.005E1149.00@D51MTA03.pok.ibm.com>
>That's me (amongst others).  I think, however, that it _does_ help lead to
>a resolution.  The only way to decide what properties you want an NSURI to
>have is to have some idea how you want to use it.

Reminder: The namespace name itself does not have to be the URI reference
which is dereferenced. It can be bound to one (or to many!), thus removing
the conflict between "names have to be stable" and "references have to be
relative". See, for example, my xmlns-binding: sketch, or
http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-1/#xsi:schemaLocation for illustrations of
solutions that decouple these and thus allow the two conflicting sets of
requirements to be statisfied independently.



______________________________________
Joe Kesselman  / IBM Research
Received on Thursday, 25 May 2000 13:08:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:32:42 UTC