- From: Eric van der Vlist <vdv@dyomedea.com>
- Date: Sat, 27 May 2000 09:27:44 +0200
- To: Liam Quin <liam@holoweb.net>
- CC: xml-uri@w3.org
Liam Quin wrote: > > Finally, it would make sense to abandon the idea of having a URI in there > at all, and use a formally defined name, preferably one that does not > start with "http:" in any examples :-) The Java guys have been wise with their path based on reverse DN... It gets the uniqueness from the domain name and is different enough to avoid trying to reference the address. If we had to find anew notation, why couldn't we use a similar one ? Eric -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric van der Vlist Dyomedea http://dyomedea.com http://xmlfr.org http://4xt.org http://ducotede.com ------------------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Saturday, 27 May 2000 03:26:14 UTC