W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-uri@w3.org > May 2000

RE: Persistent caches - was: Are *relative* URIs as namespace nem es considered harmful?

From: James Tauber <JTauber@bowstreet.com>
Date: Sat, 20 May 2000 15:23:00 -0400
Message-ID: <10A4D120D026D41181E700B0D020AA8C0EBEEC@mail.hq.bowstreet.com>
To: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>, xml-uri@w3.org
> FPIs now allow delegation mechanisms, so nothing prevents us 
> from setting up a bunch of FPI root servers that know how to delegate down
the > FPI tree.   All that's really needed is a simple server-to-server 
> protocol, a well-known port, and some commitment.

My early FPI-resolution proposals envisaged a separate protocol but then it
occurred to me that by achieving the delegation via SGML Open catalogs,
catalogs could be referenced by URL so no dedicated protocol was needed.

James
Received on Saturday, 20 May 2000 15:24:52 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:32:42 UTC