- From: Simon St.Laurent <simonstl@simonstl.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 14:30:11 -0400
- To: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>, "xml-uri@w3.org" <xml-uri@w3.org>
At 02:19 PM 5/16/00 -0400, John Cowan wrote: >keshlam@us.ibm.com wrote: > >> Relative URIs are a fine thing when you want them to resolve differently as >> you move a group of files from place to place. But namespace names do not >> want that behavior; the expanded name {nsuri}localname wants to stay >> _stable_ as the document is relocated. > >Well, then don't use them if that's the property you want *your* names to >have. But to be rude, are there any real cases where different namespace resolution based on file location is actually desirable? _Should_ anyone use relative URIs, and should that extra processing be expected of all namespace processors? Simon St.Laurent XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed. Building XML Applications Inside XML DTDs: Scientific and Technical Cookies / Sharing Bandwidth http://www.simonstl.com
Received on Tuesday, 16 May 2000 14:28:29 UTC