- From: John Cowan <cowan@locke.ccil.org>
- Date: Sat, 27 May 100 22:28:53 -0400 (EDT)
- To: tbray@textuality.com (Tim Bray)
- Cc: xml-uri@w3.org
Tim Bray scripsit: > At the end of the day, there are only two consistent positions regarding > comparison and equivalence of namespace names: > > 1. byte-for-byte string comparison of the namespace name as given > 2. byte-for-byte comparison of the indicated resource after retrieving it > All of the intervening positions are fatally compromised IMHO. Why is the "data URI" proposal fatally compromised? -- John Cowan cowan@ccil.org Yes, I know the message date is bogus. I can't help it. --me, on far too many occasions
Received on Saturday, 27 May 2000 22:04:55 UTC