- From: Simon St.Laurent <simonstl@simonstl.com>
- Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 08:43:59 -0400
- To: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, xml-uri@w3.org
At 10:33 AM 5/16/00 -0400, Dan Connolly wrote: >I'd like to discuss this issue in more black-and-white terms; >here's an example that has clarified the situation for at >least a few folks: I hate to be so blunt, but I think I'd fire anyone who produced a system where the actual contents of documents would change if files were moved from place to place. It might be convenient for the document creators, but I don't think I could possibly justify that in a production environment, even ones that weren't necessarily 'mission critical'. >Web Architecture, as I understand it, says that no, the two ><bat/> elements are associated with different points >in the Web, and that the stylesheet should produce What exactly is this 'Web Architecture' that keeps getting thrown around? Is it: http://www.w3.org/DesignIssues/Architecture.html If so, there's not a whole lot of meat there for us to work with, and it feels like 'Web Architecture' is being used as a convenient but unexplained 'bludgeon'. Simon St.Laurent XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed. Building XML Applications Inside XML DTDs: Scientific and Technical Cookies / Sharing Bandwidth http://www.simonstl.com
Received on Thursday, 18 May 2000 08:41:56 UTC