W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-uri@w3.org > May 2000

Re: A thought about relative URI comparison

From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 16:58:19 -0400
Message-ID: <3921B66B.B41E702@reutershealth.com>
To: "David G. Durand" <david@dynamicDiagrams.com>, "xml-uri@w3.org" <xml-uri@w3.org>
"David G. Durand" wrote:

> Since the Namespace specification does not specify _what_ base URI
> should be used, it would be possible to say that namespaces are
> always resolved relative to the empty string.

But RFC 2396 does say.
> I'm not really suggesting that this is a good solution; rather, I
> think it's interesting that one could substantially get the effect of
> string-based comparison, while nominally preserving a "relative URI"
> interpretation.

*Some* relative URI reference interpretation, yes.  But not that of
RFC 2396.


Schlingt dreifach einen Kreis um dies! || John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Schliesst euer Aug vor heiliger Schau,  || http://www.reutershealth.com
Denn er genoss vom Honig-Tau,           || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Und trank die Milch vom Paradies.            -- Coleridge (tr. Politzer)
Received on Tuesday, 16 May 2000 16:58:28 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:13:58 UTC