- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 16:58:19 -0400
- To: "David G. Durand" <david@dynamicDiagrams.com>, "xml-uri@w3.org" <xml-uri@w3.org>
"David G. Durand" wrote: > Since the Namespace specification does not specify _what_ base URI > should be used, it would be possible to say that namespaces are > always resolved relative to the empty string. But RFC 2396 does say. > I'm not really suggesting that this is a good solution; rather, I > think it's interesting that one could substantially get the effect of > string-based comparison, while nominally preserving a "relative URI" > interpretation. *Some* relative URI reference interpretation, yes. But not that of RFC 2396. -- Schlingt dreifach einen Kreis um dies! || John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com> Schliesst euer Aug vor heiliger Schau, || http://www.reutershealth.com Denn er genoss vom Honig-Tau, || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan Und trank die Milch vom Paradies. -- Coleridge (tr. Politzer)
Received on Tuesday, 16 May 2000 16:58:28 UTC