Re: URIs quack like a duck

Michael Mealling scripsit:

> The 'backward compatibility argument' doesn't hold much
> water with me... How many applications actually depend on this change?
> If it isn't in the hundreds of thousands then I don't really care....

Feh.  You are willing, then, to dishonor your word, provided only a
few persons who relied on it are "inconvenienced" thereby?  Remind me
never to call *you* as a witness for anything.

By issuing a Recommendation, the W3C as an organization pledged its word.

-- 
John Cowan                                   cowan@ccil.org
	Yes, I know the message date is bogus.  I can't help it.
		--me, on far too many occasions

Received on Monday, 29 May 2000 20:26:29 UTC