- From: Rick JELLIFFE <ricko@geotempo.com>
- Date: Tue, 30 May 2000 00:49:19 +0800
- To: xml-uri@w3.org
> From: Paul W. Abrahams (abrahams@valinet.com) > The problem is that if it looks like a duck and quacks like a duck, it's hard to > prevent people from imposing duckish expectations on it. URIs create those > expectations. Has anyone else been reminded through all this of Swift's School of Languages? The philosophers of this School declared that every word could be made into a noun, and that every noun had a physical object that could represent it, and therefore that one could get a universal language by using the objects directly. If you had enough objects with you, you could disuss any subject: instead of needing the word "cat" you could grab a cat out of your bag! I am not sure whether Tim Bray's option #2 (retrieve the resource) is not an idea from that School. Instead of needing a very big bag, we have http :-) Rick Jelliffe
Received on Monday, 29 May 2000 12:41:21 UTC