- From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@kiwi.ICS.UCI.EDU>
- Date: Sat, 27 May 2000 20:30:56 -0700
- To: Larry Masinter <masinter@attlabs.att.com>
- cc: abrahams@acm.org, michaelm@netsol.com, Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>, xml-uri@w3.org
I honestly don't see what the big deal is regarding this stuff. If there needs to be another BNF entry, we can add one. If XML wants a single BNF token right now to represent the exact meaning of the term as used in a specific setting, then they can very well create one of their own using the other BNF terms in the URI spec. It doesn't have to be in RFC 2396 just to define a given syntax. Sure, it would be nice, but then so would a time machine. ....Roy
Received on Saturday, 27 May 2000 23:31:10 UTC