- From: Michael Mealling <michael@bailey.dscga.com>
- Date: Wed, 24 May 2000 16:30:46 -0400
- To: Rick JELLIFFE <ricko@geotempo.com>
- Cc: xml-uri@w3.org
On Thu, May 25, 2000 at 04:42:32AM +0800, Rick JELLIFFE wrote: > I think they could, iff the RFCs for each access method defined > it as a property. For example, if whatever RFC defines ftp: > said "The property of persistance should not be implied about > a URI that uses the ftp: method". > > I haven't checked all the RFCs, but I don't recall that they do > give this information. So the problem is not URIs but that there > is no way to provide a warrant about them. I'm pretty sure the only one that does is the URN scheme spec which is RFC 2141 and that's because it was designed with that property in mind... -MM -- -------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Michael Mealling | Vote Libertarian! | www.rwhois.net/michael Sr. Research Engineer | www.ga.lp.org/gwinnett | ICQ#: 14198821 Network Solutions | www.lp.org | michaelm@netsol.com
Received on Wednesday, 24 May 2000 16:42:14 UTC