W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-uri@w3.org > May 2000

Re: Terminology: `absolutization' is vile, but nothing else is better

From: Simon St.Laurent <simonstl@simonstl.com>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 15:51:16 -0400
Message-Id: <200005181949.PAA21026@hesketh.net>
To: xml-uri@w3.org
At 03:43 PM 5/18/00 -0400, keshlam@us.ibm.com wrote:
>We could  turn "absolutization" into A12N, derived from  "A followed by 12
>characters followed by N". That would make it even less comprehensible to
>the uninitiated, but one heckuva lot easier to spell and type. Anyone on
>the I18N and C14N groups care to comment?

Should we start in on I14Y for interoperability, while we're at it?

Simon St.Laurent
XML Elements of Style / XML: A Primer, 2nd Ed.
Building XML Applications
Inside XML DTDs: Scientific and Technical
Cookies / Sharing Bandwidth
Received on Thursday, 18 May 2000 15:49:14 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:13:58 UTC