- From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
- Date: Tue, 16 May 2000 14:55:33 -0400
- To: "Simon St.Laurent" <simonstl@simonstl.com>, "xml-uri@w3.org" <xml-uri@w3.org>
"Simon St.Laurent" wrote: > But to be rude, are there any real cases where different namespace > resolution based on file location is actually desirable? Desirable or not, it's a fait accompli. > _Should_ anyone use relative URIs, and should that extra processing be > expected of all namespace processors? The amount of extra processing is trivial: it's a red herring. Should we stick to our commitments, or say that they were in error because in conflict with our basic vision? -- Schlingt dreifach einen Kreis um dies! || John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com> Schliesst euer Aug vor heiliger Schau, || http://www.reutershealth.com Denn er genoss vom Honig-Tau, || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan Und trank die Milch vom Paradies. -- Coleridge (tr. Politzer)
Received on Tuesday, 16 May 2000 14:56:51 UTC