W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-uri@w3.org > May 2000

Re: URI versus URI Reference

From: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Date: Fri, 26 May 2000 14:30:16 -0400
Message-ID: <392EC2B8.7B0FA279@reutershealth.com>
To: abrahams@acm.org
CC: "xml-uri@w3.org" <xml-uri@w3.org>
"Paul W. Abrahams" wrote:

> > (There is a hack in RFC 2396 that allows deprecated relative
> > URI references like "http:foo", meaning the same as "foo", provided that
> > the base URI uses the "http:" scheme also.  If not, "http:foo" is undefined.)

Specifically in clause 5.2, step 3, paragraph 2.

> It would be better to define ``absolute'' in semantic terms, i.e., not merely in terms of
> its syntactic form.

I don't think that any such definition can exist that is both correct and
complete.

-- 

Schlingt dreifach einen Kreis um dies! || John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>
Schliesst euer Aug vor heiliger Schau,  || http://www.reutershealth.com
Denn er genoss vom Honig-Tau,           || http://www.ccil.org/~cowan
Und trank die Milch vom Paradies.            -- Coleridge (tr. Politzer)
Received on Friday, 26 May 2000 14:30:44 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Tuesday, 6 January 2015 20:32:43 UTC