- From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
- Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 08:46:19 +0100 (BST)
- To: abrahams@acm.org
- CC: xml-uri@w3.org
> Option 3 may require more than a simple rewriting of XPath. It isn't clear > that the definition of a namespace node in XPath 5.4 will be sensible with > this change, and the discussion to date hasn't really addressed that > question. Since most (all?) current xpath implementations implement option 3 despite the xpath spec saying otherwise, I can't see how you could claim that option 3 could have any problems for xpath. David
Received on Tuesday, 23 May 2000 03:48:01 UTC