W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-uri@w3.org > May 2000

Re: Swamped (Was:Re: Call the question!)

From: David Carlisle <davidc@nag.co.uk>
Date: Tue, 23 May 2000 08:46:19 +0100 (BST)
Message-Id: <200005230746.IAA19816@nag.co.uk>
To: abrahams@acm.org
CC: xml-uri@w3.org

> Option 3 may require more than a simple rewriting of XPath.   It isn't clear
> that the definition of a namespace node in XPath 5.4 will be sensible with
> this change, and the discussion to date hasn't really addressed that
> question.

Since most (all?) current xpath implementations implement option 3
despite the xpath spec saying otherwise, I can't see how you could claim
that option 3 could have any problems for xpath.

Received on Tuesday, 23 May 2000 03:48:01 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:13:58 UTC