- From: Jonathan Borden <jborden@mediaone.net>
- Date: Wed, 31 May 2000 13:44:18 -0400
- To: "Tim Berners-Lee" <timbl@w3.org>, <michaelm@netsol.com>, "Graham Klyne" <GK@dial.pipex.com>
- Cc: <xml-uri@w3.org>
Tim, if we define: > > URI equality gives one form of sameness. It is a low-level form. For any > form > of == other than URI string comparison, you have > > u1 = u2 => R1 == R2 > as applying to both absolute and relative URI references (and I argue that since many 'absolute' URIs are in fact context dependent this isn't such an unreasonable definition), isn't the namespace 'problem' solved? Jonathan
Received on Wednesday, 31 May 2000 13:52:15 UTC