W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > xml-uri@w3.org > May 2000

Re: Are *relative* URIs as namespace nemes considered harmful?

From: Clark C. Evans <cce@clarkevans.com>
Date: Thu, 18 May 2000 23:03:46 -0400 (EDT)
To: Tim Berners-Lee <timbl@w3.org>
cc: John Cowan <jcowan@reutershealth.com>, xml-uri@w3.org
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.10.10005182250410.1858-100000@clarkevans.com>
On Thu, 18 May 2000, Tim Berners-Lee wrote:
> XPath explicitly calls for absolutization before comparison.  

Gosh.  I have read the spec many times... and have
consistently missed this sentance in the specification.
I feel very dumb at the moment.    I guess I had never
expected the XPath spec to *redefine* the specific 
definitions (of identity) laid out so clearly in the
namespace specification.

Luckly, I don't think I am alone.  I tried out relative
namespaces on XT -- James Clark's software does not
seem to be doing this absolutization; but perhaps my
testing is such that I don't quite understand what
would reasonably be absolutized or how it would be
absolutized. Does *any* XSLT processor (implementing 
XPath) support relative URI absolutization?

Slightly Shocked and a tad bit Confused,

Received on Thursday, 18 May 2000 23:01:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.4.0 : Friday, 17 January 2020 23:13:58 UTC