1.1.1 fixes
30 March 2006 Minutes
Partial Regrets
understanding guideline docs
Understanding Guideline Drafts - Survey available
1.1 level 3 SC
survey on 1.2.2 2.3.2 and 4.1
30 March 2006 Agenda ================================
Team B Survey
27 March 2006 Editor's Draft Published
Update on item added to last meeting.
23 March 2006 Minutes
RE: Noon call
Ofdah. Last minute addition?
Slight proposed change to address a comment
2-question survey for tomorrow
23 March 2006 Agenda ==================================
- Re: 23 March 2006 Agenda ==================================
- Re: 23 March 2006 Agenda =probably regrets
- Regrets: 23 March 2006 Agenda ==================================
- Re: 23 March 2006 Agenda ========
Two more surveys
New How To Meet and techniques for SC 2.4.5
TWO STAGES IF YOU HELP
Surveys for 23 March
Team C survey for 23 March 2006
Issues - misc
normative issues to close
Draft of WCAG
Scoping clarifications
Edititorial change to conformance section
Working group hours
SC 2.4.5: Good news about AT support
mailing list test
16 March 2006 Minutes
Updated Editor's Draft
16 March 2006 Agenda ===========================
- Re: 16 March 2006 Agenda - partial regrets
- Re: 16 March 2006 Agenda ===========================
- R: 16 March 2006 Agenda ===========================
Survey - Team A Techniques for March 16
4.1 issues
Three new techniques for 4.1.2
Proposal for HOW TO MEET 4.1.2
Revised proposal for 4.1.2
Survey - Misc. Issues and Proposals for March 16
EARL
Please look over new 1.1.1 and its techniques.
4.2 issues
One more survey!
Regrets for 16 March telecon
2.4.5
Baselines: how specific?
Proposal to Delete or Keep 2.4.1
- Re: Proposal to Delete or Keep 2.4.1
- RE: Proposal to Delete or Keep 2.4.1
- Re: Proposal to Delete or Keep 2.4.1
- RE: Proposal to Delete or Keep 2.4.1
- RE: Proposal to Delete or Keep 2.4.1
New survey on items 1.1 and 4.1
Fixing 4.1
Reworking 1.1
Side Benefits
test
Describing the delivery unit in text immediately preceding the programmatic reference
Proposal - Definition of Programmatically determined
Two more March 13 surveys
Remaining General Issues - survey for 13 March
Open Issue 486 - Synchronization WCAG with ACCLIP Specifications
- RE: Open Issue 486 - Synchronization WCAG with ACCLIP Specifications
- RE: Open Issue 486 - Synchronization WCAG with ACCLIP Specifications
- RE: Open Issue 486 - Synchronization WCAG with ACCLIP Specifications
741 Please add Digital Rights Management and visual verification to issues list.
General Issues - Proposals to close
New failure technique for 3.2.5: automatic updates
RE: Issues from Microsoft - Issue #4
FW: Realtime caption tools?
Issues from Microsoft
09 March 2006 Minutes (complete)
09 March 2006 Minutes
regrets
Wording of SC 1.3.5
Introduction Issues and proposals - survey for 09 March
Conformance Issues and Proposals - survey for 09 March
Partial regrets RE: 09 March 2006 Agenda
oops - missed a conformance item - miscategorized.
FW: 09 March 2006 Agenda
Misc. propoasls from the list - survey for 09 March
Revised Conformance Section
INTRODUCTIONS - issues and proposed resolutions
CONFORMANCE issues & resolutions -- based on new conformance section.
- RE: CONFORMANCE issues & resolutions -- based on new conformance section.
- RE: CONFORMANCE issues & resolutions -- based on new conformance section.
propose we change element to component throughout
regrets thursday
Team B Survey for March 9
Team A survey for 09 March
4.1 work in progress
Add at technique to 1.3.1
Is using frames to group links a sufficient technique for 2.4.3?
- RE: Is using frames to group links a sufficient technique for 2.4.3?
- RE: Is using frames to group links a sufficient technique for 2.4.3?
Web Pages (including Web Applications)
2.4.5 Proposal
SLIGHT EDIT TO 4.2.1
New (proposed) SC 3.1.6 A mechanism is available for finding specific pronunciation of words where meaning cannot be determined without pronunciation.
Proposed wording for SC 1.3.1
Survey from Team C
REAL-TIME
CONTENT
Partial regrets for 2 March 2006
Late Regrets: 02 March 2006 Agenda ===========================================
Definition of idiom
02 March 2006 Minutes
Partial regrets: 02 March 2006 Agenda
Regrets, 02 March 2006 Agenda
Long meeting again. 3 to 6 Eastern
02 March 2006 Agenda ===========================================
- Re: 02 March 2006 Agenda - partial regrets
- Regrets: 02 March 2006 Agenda ===========================================
- partial regrets - Re: 02 March 2006 Agenda ===
- Partial Regrets -- Re: 02 March 2006 Agenda
Questionaire available from Team B
Propose deleting failure for 3.2.5
- RE: Propose deleting failure for 3.2.5
- Re: Propose deleting failure for 3.2.5
- RE: Propose deleting failure for 3.2.5
- RE: Propose deleting failure for 3.2.5
- RE: Propose deleting failure for 3.2.5
- RE: Propose deleting failure for 3.2.5
- RE: Propose deleting failure for 3.2.5
- RE: Propose deleting failure for 3.2.5
proposal to change Delivery Unit to Web Page or other primary resource
New Proposed Glossary.
Questionaire available from Team B
Questionnaire available from Team C
text docs
Words in context
Updated Editor's drafts
Late regrets: 23 February 2006 Agenda ================================
SC 2.4.5: links in context
- Re: SC 2.4.5: links in context
- Re: SC 2.4.5: links in context
- Re: SC 2.4.5: links in context
- RE: SC 2.4.5: links in context
- RE: SC 2.4.5: links in context
- RE: SC 2.4.5: links in context
- RE: SC 2.4.5: links in context
Regrets for March 2 WCAG WG meeting plus questions
Real-time events
New Caption Definition - please comment
- RE: New Caption Definition - please comment
- Re: New Caption Definition - please comment
23 Feb. 2006 Minutes
Preview - Candidate Recommendation considerations
REMINDER - Meeting starts 1 hour early again.
23 February 2006 Agenda ================================
- Re: 23 February 2006 Agenda ================================
- Regrets: 23 February 2006 Agenda ================================
- regrets: 23 February 2006 Agenda
Team B Surveys
Questionnaire for 2.2 techniques
RE: Team B - hierarchy note
Misc. 1.1, 2.3, 3.2 and 4.1 items from Team A (23 Feb.)
GLOSSARY
DROP unfamiliar content
programmatically determined
perceivable structures
- Re: perceivable structures
- Re: perceivable structures
- RE: perceivable structures
- RE: perceivable structures
Definition Nesting
link DEFINITION
2.3 Suggested edits for guidelines 2.3 on Seizure disorders
Suggested edits for guidelines 1.4 CONTRAST
Definition of baseline
feedback on Web Unit
About tests 37-41 (headers)
- RE: About tests 37-41 (headers)
FYI: Approaching deadlines for Comments on European Activities Related to Web Accessibility
16 Feb. 2006 Minutes
Re: 16 February 2006 Agenda ========================================
Survey for 1.3 and 2.4
Survey for 2.1 and 2.2
new sufficient technique for 2.3.1
16 February 2006 Agenda ========================================
- Regrets - Re: 16 February 2006 Agenda
- Regrets: 16 February 2006 Agenda ========================================
- Regrets - Re: 16 February 2006 Agenda ========================================
1.1 Survey
Definition of "technology": proposed modification
caption addition
09 February 2006 Minutes
collated transcript technique
Regrets: 09 February 2006 Agenda ==========================
RE: BIG ISSUE -- TAKE 2 on WEB UNIT - RATIONALE
one more survey (sorry for the late notice)
Glossary Issues Survey
REwrite of 1.1.6
Glossary issues
RELATED ISSUE AUTHORED UNIT
BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units
- FW: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units
- Re: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units
- RE: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units
- Re: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units
- RE: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units
- RE: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units
- Re: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units
- RE: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units
- Re: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units
- RE: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units
- Why an standalone image shall conform to WCAG 2.0? (was Re: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units)
- RE: Why an standalone image shall conform to WCAG 2.0? (was Re: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units)
- Re: Why an standalone image shall conform to WCAG 2.0? (was Re: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units)
- RE: Why an standalone image shall conform to WCAG 2.0? (was Re: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units)
- Re: Why an standalone image shall conform to WCAG 2.0? (was Re: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units)
- RE: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units
- Re: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units
- RE: Why an standalone image shall conform to WCAG 2.0? (was Re: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units)
- Content Negotiation (was: Why an standalone image shall conform to WCAG 2.0?)
- RE: Content Negotiation (was: Why an standalone image shall conform to WCAG 2.0?)
- Re: Content Negotiation (was: Why an standalone image shall conform to WCAG 2.0?)
3.2.4 edit?
09 February 2006 Agenda ==========================
- Re: 09 February 2006 Agenda ==========================
- Re: 09 February 2006 Agenda ==========================
- Regrets: 09 February 2006 Agenda ==========================
MEETING STARTS 1 hour early again this week. (thursday)
Surveys for GL 1.3, 2.4
regrets for 9 February 2006 WCAG WG teleconference
02 February 2006 Minutes (with URI)
02 February 2006 Minutes
Joint WAI Working group Teleconference for 9 February 2006
issue 741
Scripting techniques for review
Surveys for this week
Note that this weeks meeting is scheduled to start one hour earlier than our previous meeting time and will run for 3 - 3.5 hrs.
02 February 2006 Agenda =====================================
- Regrets: 02 February 2006 Agenda =====================================
- Partial regrets RE: 02 February 2006 Agenda =====================================
Proposals for 3.2.2
proposed enhanced definition for caption
Action Item: caption failure
Action item: resources on sign language video
Web authoring statistics by Google
regrets for next week teleconf
Next weeks meeting starting 1 hour earlier and going 3 to 3.5 hrs
Regrets: 26 January 2006 Agenda ========================================
26 January Open issues and techniques for Guideline 1.1
26 January Open issues and techniques for Guideline 2.3
2.3 Issue Cleanup - Revisited
programmatically determined and AT
26 January Open issues and techniques for Guideline 1.4
26 January 2006 Agenda ========================================
- Re: 26 January 2006 Agenda ========================================
- Re: 26 January 2006 Agenda ========================================
- Regrets: 26 January 2006 Agenda ========================================
26 January Open issues and techniques for Guideline 1.2
2.3 Issue Cleanup
Clearing Issues for 1.4
Need to have a "technology independent" heading in the GL
- RE: Need to have a "technology independent" heading in the GL
- RE: Need to have a "technology independent" heading in the GL
Survey of techniques for SC 1.3.1
WCAG-DI consistency of "perceivable unit" and "user agent" definitions?
FW: 1.2 issue
SMIL experts
SMIL TECHNIQUE
Re: Tehcnique for 1.1.1 Using the body of the applet element
Tehcnique for 1.1.1 Using the body of the applet element
New bullet for 2.2.1 to account for session timeouts
Re: [Bugzilla WCAG Issue 1680] alt text for linked images (1)
Concerns with SC 4.1.2 and dynamic HTML components
New or revised techniques for 3.1 and 1.1
Link to UW
19 January Minutes
Link to UW
Do we need to think about Ink ML in relation to Images or Otherwise for WCAG 2?
Regrets: 17 January 2006 Agenda =======================================
17 January 2006 Agenda =======================================
- Re: 17 January 2006 Agenda =======================================
- Regrets - no message (Was: RE: 17 January 2006 Agenda =======================================)
- Regrets: 17 January 2006 Agenda =======================================
- Re: 17 January 2006 Agenda
- Late regrets - Re: 17 January 2006 Agenda ====
Techniques Task Force Meeting
Updated Editor's drafts
Tentativedates for next WCAG WG face to face
Re: Fw: Real show
Issues and recommendations - BATCH 1 Survey
Technology-specific techniques
late regrets for TH call
Updated mapping WCAG 1.0 - WCAG 2.0
technique to overcome meaningful link text
- RE: technique to overcome meaningful link text
- Re: technique to overcome meaningful link text
- RE: technique to overcome meaningful link text
- Re: technique to overcome meaningful link text
- RE: technique to overcome meaningful link text
- Re: technique to overcome meaningful link text
12 January 2006 Minutes
technique to overcome meaningful link text
Proposal for Drafting committee
Regrets: 12 January 2006 Agenda =======================================
GL 1.3 Survey for tomorrow's teleconference available
Session timeouts not part of 2.2.1?
- Re: Session timeouts not part of 2.2.1?
- RE: Session timeouts not part of 2.2.1?
- RE: Session timeouts not part of 2.2.1?
- RE: Session timeouts not part of 2.2.1?
12 January 2006 Agenda =======================================
- RE: 12 January 2006 Agenda =======================================
- RE: 12 January 2006 Agenda =======================================
- Regrets: 12 January 2006 Agenda =======================================
Technique boilerplate
[action] Reasons for not moving SC 3.2.2 up to level 1
- Re: [action] Reasons for not moving SC 3.2.2 up to level 1
The Need for Descriptive Text for Links
programatically determineds
Meaningful links 2.4.5
Re: proposal for removing guideline 3 (and working on it after last call as an extension)
Bug 1649 Definition of "Programmatic Reference"
05 January 2006 Minutes
addition to definition of "delivery unit".
Regrets - Re: 05 January 2006 Agenda ==================================
Regrets - Re: 05 January 2006 Agenda ==================================
One more survey!
Regrets
FW: proposal for removing guideline 3 (and working on it after last call as an extension)
Draft Techniques for Guideline 1.1. Survey Available
GL 1.3 survey available
05 January 2006 Agenda ==================================
Issues and recommendations - BATCH 1
Summary of New Issues from 23 November 2005 WD
recommendation for bug #1741 SC 2.4.2
Example for SC 3.2.2
Tab panel example for SC 3.2.1
- RE: Tab panel example for SC 3.2.1
- RE: Tab panel example for SC 3.2.1
- RE: Tab panel example for SC 3.2.1
- RE: Tab panel example for SC 3.2.1
RE: Instructions and team assignments for getting to Last Call
- RE: Instructions and team assignments for getting to Last Call
- Re: Instructions and team assignments for getting to Last Call
Re: FW: Action Items
RE: SC 2.4.5, meaningful link text
- RE: SC 2.4.5, meaningful link text