- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jan 2006 14:06:32 -0600
- To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <009301c62121$ac0ae3b0$ee8cfea9@NC6000BAK>
At the team A meeting we reviewed Summary by Alex and propose the following 1) The following are informative (C2) issues and are passed to the Editors for action. <BLOCKED::http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=1534> 1534 suggests to use Stevie Wonder's site as example for providing lyrics. Some concern over using copyrighted material. Techniques work should remove this issue. <BLOCKED::http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=1603> 1603 suggests techniques to create caption for real time material is identical to that of pre-recorded material. Techniques work should remove this issue. <BLOCKED::http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=1604> 1604 refers to use of upper case for caption of tutorial. Techniques work should remvoe this issue. <BLOCKED::http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=1732> 1732 suggests to change wording of "who benefit". "Who Benefits from Guideline 1.2: Both sentences should include " and transcripts" at the end. Otherwise the benefits of transcripts are not made clear." May affect techniques and how to meet doc. <http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=1370> 1370 is incomprehensible. Clarification needed. Recommend to keep open. 2) the following is handled by content of current techniques. <BLOCKED::http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=1627> 1627 suggests sc 1.2.4 was written with assumption of "universal sign language". [GV: ] Suggest close with comment: This is addressed by current techniques language. 3) the following all deal with the same group of issues. Suggest that we poll the group with the questions (that follow this list) to address these issues. <BLOCKED::http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=1729> 1729 suggests to add text transcript at L1 because caption may be too small and insufficient. May add more technique if wg decide to add to sc. <BLOCKED::http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=1765> 1765 debates that text transcript should be an option. Outcome of the debate may affect sc, how to, and techniques docs. <BLOCKED::http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=1815> 1815 suggests that 1.2.1 should provide collated transcript. Similar to <BLOCKED::http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=1765> 1765. Outcome of the debate may affect sc, how to, and techniques docs. <blocked::http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=1601> 1601 suggests to make "captions or transcript" L1 and "captions and transcript" L2. <blocked::http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=1602> 1602 suggests to make "audio description or transcript" L1 and "audio description and transcript" L2. <http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=1704> 1704 suggests to move 1.2.1 and 1.2.2 from L1 to L2 but add transcript in L1. This issue overlap in level discussion. <BLOCKED::http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=1816> 1816 says, "We want you to keep 1.2.2 to "Audio descriptions of video are provided for pre-recorded multimedia". Then it is possible to listen to the text, either the whole or just the one about what is happening, that is provided in 1.2.1 perhaps in another language than the original. The discussed change in the editorial note does not make it easier to get what is needed." <BLOCKED::http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=1824> 1824 says. "I think it is a good idea to change to this version as it should encourage at least a minimal level of accessibility vs. people not trying at all. Same for 1.2.2". Don't understand why this is still an open issue. <BLOCKED::http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=1730> 1730 suggests to keep caption at L1. <BLOCKED::http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=1731> 1731 suggests to keep audio description at L1. <BLOCKED::http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=1803> 1803 suggests that captions are more important than audio description. Recommend to close with explanation that captions and audio description benefit people with different disabilities <http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=1704> 1704 suggests to move 1.2.1 and 1.2.2 from L1 to L2 but add transcript in L1. <http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=1754> 1754 suggests to move 1.2.1 from L1 SC to L2 <http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=1850> 1850 suggests to move 1.2.3 from L2 to L1 to keep harmonization with section 508. SURVEY QUESTIONS 1. Should 1.2.1 include transcript option? 2. IF we have transcript option on 1.2.1 should it be at L1 3. IF we do NOT have transcript option on 1.2.1 should it be at L1 4. IF we have transcript option on 1.2.1 at L1 should transcript be required at L2 5. Should 1.2.2 include transcript option? 6. IF we have transcript option on 1.2.2 should it be at L1 7. IF we do NOT have transcript option on 1.2.2 should it be at L1 8. IF we have transcript option on 1.2.2 at L1 should transcript be required at L2 9. Should 1.2.3 be moved to level 1 and collapsed with 1.2.2 (IF it is still at L1) Suggest we also Poll the following. <BLOCKED::http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=1841> 1841 suggests to remove the term multimedia as it is too vague. Outcome of the debate may affect sc, how to, and techniques docs. Recommend to close with explanation that the proposed change would cause confusion between 1.2 and 1.1. Subject to wg consensus. <BLOCKED::http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=1152> 1152 asks for exception or phase-in for multimedia. Not likely to lead to change in SC. Recommend to close with explanation that it is an compliance or legislation concern, but not a WCAG issue. <BLOCKED::http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=1862> 1862 suggests to expand the term multimedia from audio and video to tactile and other sensories. Recommend to close with explanation that availability of tactile info over the web is limited in the near future. Gregg
Received on Tuesday, 24 January 2006 20:06:45 UTC