- From: David MacDonald <befree@magma.ca>
- Date: Sat, 11 Feb 2006 10:57:53 -0500
- To: "'Andrew Kirkpatrick'" <akirkpat@adobe.com>, "'Gregg Vanderheiden'" <gv@trace.wisc.edu>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-Id: <200602111557.k1BFvrjJ028193@mail4.magma.ca>
>>What's the longest description you've needed to wade through? That might be a factor... It depends.The end of the movie "Apocalypse Now" had long periods of no dialogue.In that case there would be quite a bit of description between the dialogue. Audio descriptions are limited to the available space between dialogue so they are generally short. In your example of the online professor.the descriptions would be generally very short.especially in a lecture series. and descriptions are limited to the space between the dialogue on the video. I've never seen a professor who doesn't talk much in a class. (oops sorry Gregg :-) ) I would also suggest that the example is not "equivalent" to that of a sighted person but rather "enhanced" because sighted people sit through the descriptions in the video, unless they hit the fast forward button. If we want to create that kind of "enhanced" experience of skipping the descriptions then I suggest put the burden on the person who wants the enhanced experience by putting in "skip description" links (like a skip nav) that the user can use to bounce over the descriptions. (kind of like the sighted person who would have to hit fast forward) That way the default presentation includes the descriptions (without having to bounce around) and the enhanced version allows the user to skip over it with a link. David MacDonald _____ From: Gregg Vanderheiden [mailto:gv@trace.wisc.edu] Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 9:21 PM To: Andrew Kirkpatrick; w3c-wai-gl@w3.org Subject: RE: REwrite of 1.1.6 Yes, I see what you are saying. But I'm not sure what value having the captions without the description would be? Gregg -- ------------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. Director - Trace R & D Center University of Wisconsin-Madison The Player for my DSS sound file is at http://tinyurl.com/dho6b <http://tinyurl.com/cmfd9> _____ From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Kirkpatrick Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 5:04 PM To: Gregg Vanderheiden; w3c-wai-gl@w3.org Subject: RE: REwrite of 1.1.6 Not everyone will want to read the descriptions intermixed with the captions. As a result, while it is fine to say that these different types of information should be mixed together, it may not create the best experience. one method that would allow users to have easy access to the descriptions within a transcript would be to link to the descriptions (the descriptions could be in the same file, or even in a separate file) instead of to include the description text directly. This way, the user could listen to the description if desired, and skipped more easily. The reason I mentioned this was that your suggested rewrite to 1.1.6 could potentially make this technique insufficient to satisfy the requirement, and I want to make sure that this would be allowed. Is that more clear? AWK _____ From: Gregg Vanderheiden [mailto:gv@trace.wisc.edu] Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 1:53 PM To: Andrew Kirkpatrick; w3c-wai-gl@w3.org Subject: RE: REwrite of 1.1.6 I don't understand this suggestion. Gregg -- ------------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. Director - Trace R & D Center University of Wisconsin-Madison The Player for my DSS sound file is at http://tinyurl.com/dho6b <http://tinyurl.com/cmfd9> _____ From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Andrew Kirkpatrick Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 9:38 AM To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org Subject: RE: REwrite of 1.1.6 Gregg, Proposed 1.1.6 For prerecorded multimedia content, a combined document containing captions <http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/appendixA.html#captionsdef> intermixed with the audio <http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/appendixA.html#audiodescdef> description transcripts is available. [How <http://www.w3.org/WAI/GL/WCAG20/WD-UNDERSTANDING-WCAG20-20060117/Overview.h tml#text-equiv-text-doc> to meet 1.1.6] This sounds fine to me, but I think that we should make sure that we accept the case where a transcript includes links to audio descriptions interspersed, as an alternative to the actual description text. For example: Transcript: This is the first spoken transcript text. This is more transcript. (<a href="#desc1">description 1</a>). This is more transcript. Blah blah blah.... Descriptions: <a name="desc1" id="desc1">1. </a>This is the first description This would improve the experience for many users,and while it is untested, I'd like to make sure that it is acceptable to use. AWK
Received on Saturday, 11 February 2006 15:58:41 UTC