- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Fri, 10 Feb 2006 21:44:02 -0600
- To: "'Carlos A Velasco'" <Carlos.Velasco@fit.fraunhofer.de>
- Cc: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
Yes The guidelines as currently written (using delivery unit ) can't be met. So we need to find a way to fix them or delete 8 or so of our core success criterion. This is one mechanism that works. Got another? Gregg -- ------------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. Director - Trace R & D Center University of Wisconsin-Madison The Player for my DSS sound file is at http://tinyurl.com/dho6b -----Original Message----- From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Carlos A Velasco Sent: Friday, February 10, 2006 1:51 PM To: Gregg Vanderheiden Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org Subject: Re: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units Hi Gregg, Gregg Vanderheiden wrote: > Hi Carlos, > > Images as delivery units cannot meet the guidelines because there is > no place in a jpg file to put an alt text. I know. But you did not reply to my question: where is the problem? A standalone JPEG image does not conform to WCAG 2.0, therefore you invent a term to replace delivery units?!! Sorry, maybe I am too thick, but I don't get it. > An HTML page with images in it can conform. But the image itself cannot. > And the image itself is a delivery unit. See above. regards, carlos -- Dr Carlos A Velasco - http://access.fit.fraunhofer.de/ Fraunhofer-Institut für Angewandte Informationstechnik FIT [Fraunhofer Institute for Applied Information Technology (FIT)] Barrierefreie Informations- und Kommunikationstechnologie für Alle Schloss Birlinghoven, D53757 Sankt Augustin (Germany) Tel: +49-2241-142609 Fax: +49-2241-1442609
Received on Saturday, 11 February 2006 03:44:12 UTC