- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Sun, 26 Feb 2006 20:06:29 -0600
- To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <00da01c63b42$6c6e8320$ee8cfea9@NC6000BAK>
While we don't want to recommend that people use text docs rather than HTML or another semantically rich form of doc, we also don't want to declare text docs as inaccessible. For one thing we carefully take all our email and make them into text documents before posting them to the web! Also there are other formats for text docs. In looking at this topic Sofia came across this text standard for NEWSLETTERS. I post it here for discussion. http://www.headstar.com/ten/ It is a bit involved for simple text docs but is very interesting in a number of ways. Certainly, if we think it meets our guidelines we should consider it as sufficient for 1.3.1 for text newsletters. Not required, but sufficient. I am looking to see if there is one for plain text docs besides the common practice rules we now have. If anyone knows of any please let me know. Gregg ------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Depts of Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. Director - Trace R & D Center University of Wisconsin-Madison < <http://trace.wisc.edu/> http://trace.wisc.edu/> FAX 608/262-8848 For a list of our list discussions http://trace.wisc.edu/lists/ The Player for my DSS sound file is at http://tinyurl.com/dho6b <http://trace.wisc.edu:8080/mailman/listinfo/>
Received on Monday, 27 February 2006 02:06:37 UTC