- From: David MacDonald <befree@magma.ca>
- Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 12:40:57 -0500
- To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, "'Gregg Vanderheiden'" <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
I provide this email that was sent to me by a screen reader user regarding meaningful links. -----Original Message----- From: Darold Lindquist Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 12:25 PM To: David MacDonald Subject: Re: 2.4.5 I have been a screen reader user for more than 15 years and have worked as a Technology Accessibility consultant on accessibility related projects for the past six years. From my experience, here are some quick thoughts on the usefulness of meaningful links on the web for screen reader users. Providing meaningful link text as the association to the target, still benefits the navigation decision making process and overall user experience. Since jumping between links or listing the links are still commonly used navigation techniques on pages, links that can be read out of context are useful for these users. Meaningful links are especially useful when accessing infrequently visited or new web sites. For more frequently visited sites, easily recognizable links provide familiar landmarks for memorizing and quicker site navigation. * Curretly, screen readers in their default installations do not deliver consistent presentations of tool tip techniques such as the title attribute, that can provide supplemental information on elements such as links. So, the displayed link text remains a significant navigation feature on web sites. * For example, users tabbing through links or, accessing the links through some AT user agent's links list feature only receive the content of the displayed link text. In these cases, As the user moves through the available links on the page, they are not receiving any of the related information that may be contained in surrounding paragraph text. Concise links that provide some meaningful text about the destination will always be more useful to them than the more ambiguous "click here" type links. To further illustrate this point, a comparison may be made between links on a web page and an inaccessible form with multiple input fields. For an inaccessible form, users will tab through the fields, but may only hear an "Enter Text" prompt for each of the input fields. The user can use the AT's reading functions to examine the page more closely, determine what label is associated with each field, and then enter the appropriate text. A similar user experience occurs when links on web pages give choices of go here or click here. Screen readers do identify links and users can determine where links are bringing them by examining the surrounding text more closely. But, for novice or less technical users, this often degrades the user experience resulting in an exercise in frustration. For screen reader users, links that provide some information about their destination are always better than links that contain no relevant information at all. * Requiring that links contain text that orients the user to the purpose or content of the destination is beneficial to this user group and should remain prominent in WCAG version 2.0. Darold Lindquist
Received on Friday, 6 January 2006 17:41:35 UTC