- From: David MacDonald <befree@magma.ca>
- Date: Fri, 6 Jan 2006 12:40:57 -0500
- To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>, "'Gregg Vanderheiden'" <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
I provide this email that was sent to me by a screen reader user regarding
meaningful links.
-----Original Message-----
From: Darold Lindquist
Sent: Friday, January 06, 2006 12:25 PM
To: David MacDonald
Subject: Re: 2.4.5
I have been a screen reader user for more than
15 years and have worked as a Technology
Accessibility consultant on accessibility related
projects for the past six years. From my
experience, here are some quick thoughts on the
usefulness of meaningful links on the web for screen reader users.
Providing meaningful link text as the association
to the target, still benefits the navigation
decision making process and overall user
experience. Since jumping between links or
listing the links are still commonly
used navigation techniques on pages, links that
can be read out of context are useful for these
users. Meaningful links are especially useful
when accessing infrequently visited or new web
sites. For more frequently visited sites, easily
recognizable links provide familiar
landmarks for memorizing and quicker site navigation.
* Curretly, screen readers in their default
installations do not deliver consistent
presentations of tool tip techniques such as
the title attribute, that can provide
supplemental information on elements such as
links. So, the displayed link text remains a
significant navigation feature on web sites.
* For example, users tabbing through links
or, accessing the links through some AT user
agent's links list feature only receive the
content of the displayed link text. In these
cases, As the user moves through the available
links on the page, they are not receiving any
of the related information that may be
contained in surrounding paragraph text.
Concise links that provide some meaningful text
about the destination will always be more
useful to them than the more ambiguous "click here" type links.
To further illustrate this point, a comparison
may be made between links on a web page and an
inaccessible form with multiple input fields. For
an inaccessible form, users will tab through the
fields, but may only hear an "Enter Text" prompt
for each of the input fields. The user can use
the AT's reading functions to examine the page
more closely, determine what label is associated
with each field, and then enter the appropriate
text. A similar user experience occurs when links
on web pages give choices of go here or click
here. Screen readers do identify links and users
can determine where links are bringing them by
examining the surrounding text more closely. But,
for novice or less technical users, this often
degrades the user experience resulting in an
exercise in frustration. For screen reader users,
links that provide some information about their
destination are always better than links that
contain no relevant information at all.
* Requiring that links contain text that
orients the user to the purpose or content of
the destination is beneficial to this user
group and should remain prominent in WCAG version 2.0.
Darold Lindquist
Received on Friday, 6 January 2006 17:41:35 UTC