- From: Bailey, Bruce <Bruce.Bailey@ed.gov>
- Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 20:46:30 -0500
- To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <CCDBDCBFA650F74AA88830D4BACDBAB50B2D4B99@wdcrobe2m02.ed.gov>
> Hi Bruce Thank you Gregg for your patient efforts with remedial vocabulary lessons. > Here is the DI group definition of perceivable unit I have been referencing the DI terms from the WCAG2 glossary. That hasn't helped much. > You have it at the wrong end of the chain. Okay, so sometimes (e.g., a PDF file) a Delivery Unit contains multiple Perceivable Units (e.g., pages), other times (e.g., a web page with images) a Perceivable Unit contains multiple Delivery Units. Are you satisfied that Web Unit avoids this conundrum? How about my example of a frame based web "page"? Each frame is a Web Unit (so each can have a title), but the whole bundle (web quote page unquote) is also a Web Unit? The term content has similar issues. Sometimes content is just part of a web page, content refers to a whole page or web application, sometimes content refers to a collection of pages or a whole site. By the way, is a Perceivable Unit only that which fits into a widow (without scrolling) at any given time? Again, I am hoping such a question is moot, at least with regard to WCAG 2.0.
Received on Friday, 10 February 2006 01:46:34 UTC