- From: Bailey, Bruce <Bruce.Bailey@ed.gov>
- Date: Thu, 9 Feb 2006 09:14:16 -0500
- To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
>> Components that have the same functionality within content are identified consistently. > Yes. This sounds good. Especially since the latest version said within a page or between pages. > Oops. We can only require that it be consistent within a page or within a set of pages. > Not for all content. How would you cover that aspect? I am not understanding the problem. Is not a "set of pages" (or a whole domain) what is being scoped in a conformance claim? For the purposes of applying WCAG 2.0, how is this not effectively "all content"? Can you give me a counter example of where it would be appropriate for an image to have one meaning on one part of a web site and a different purpose elsewhere on the site?
Received on Thursday, 9 February 2006 14:14:24 UTC