w3c-wai-gl@w3.org from January to March 2006 by date

Friday, 31 March 2006

• Re: R: 30 March 2006 Agenda ================================ Luca Mascaro
• R: 30 March 2006 Agenda ================================ Roberto Castaldo
• 1.1.1 fixes Gregg Vanderheiden

Thursday, 30 March 2006

• 30 March 2006 Minutes Ben Caldwell
• Re: Partial Regrets Cynthia Shelly
• RE: understanding guideline docs John M Slatin
• regrets: 30 March 2006 Agenda Roberto Ellero
• RE: understanding guideline docs Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• Partial Regrets Cynthia Shelly

Wednesday, 29 March 2006

• RE: 1.1 level 3 SC Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: 1.1 level 3 SC Bailey, Bruce
• understanding guideline docs Gregg Vanderheiden
• Understanding Guideline Drafts - Survey available Ben Caldwell
• RE: 1.1 level 3 SC John M Slatin
• RE: survey on 1.2.2 2.3.2 and 4.1 Yvette Hoitink
• RE: 1.1 level 3 SC Loretta Guarino Reid
• 1.1 level 3 SC Gregg Vanderheiden

Tuesday, 28 March 2006

• survey on 1.2.2 2.3.2 and 4.1 Gregg Vanderheiden
• 30 March 2006 Agenda ================================ Gregg Vanderheiden
• Team B Survey Loretta Guarino Reid
• 27 March 2006 Editor's Draft Published Ben Caldwell

Monday, 27 March 2006

• Update on item added to last meeting. Gregg Vanderheiden

Friday, 24 March 2006

• Re: Regrets: 23 March 2006 Agenda ================================== Sebastiano Nutarelli (IWA/HWG)
• Re: Regrets: 23 March 2006 Agenda ================================== Luca Mascaro
• Re: 23 March 2006 Minutes Judy Brewer
• Re: 23 March 2006 Minutes Shadi Abou-Zahra
• Re: Noon call - PACIFIC TIME ROOM for CSUN participants. - Late regrets Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc. -

Thursday, 23 March 2006

• 23 March 2006 Minutes Ben Caldwell
• Re: 23 March 2006 Agenda ======== Christophe Strobbe
• RE: Noon call - PACIFIC TIME ROOM for CSUN participants. Gregg Vanderheiden
• Regrets: 23 March 2006 Agenda ================================== Roberto Castaldo
• RE: Noon call Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: 23 March 2006 Agenda =probably regrets Becky Gibson
• Re: 23 March 2006 Agenda ================================== Tim Boland
• Ofdah. Last minute addition? Gregg Vanderheiden

Wednesday, 22 March 2006

• FW: Quality Assurance (QA) Questions Re: Draft of WCAG Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Slight proposed change to address a comment John M Slatin
• Slight proposed change to address a comment Gregg Vanderheiden
• 2-question survey for tomorrow Ben Caldwell
• Re: normative issues to close Gez Lemon
• RE: normative issues to close Gregg Vanderheiden
• 23 March 2006 Agenda ================================== Gregg Vanderheiden

Tuesday, 21 March 2006

• Two more surveys Loretta Guarino Reid
• New How To Meet and techniques for SC 2.4.5 Loretta Guarino Reid
• TWO STAGES IF YOU HELP Gregg Vanderheiden
• Surveys for 23 March Ben Caldwell
• RE: normative issues to close Bailey, Bruce
• Team C survey for 23 March 2006 Michael Cooper
• Quality Assurance (QA) Questions Re: Draft of WCAG Tim Boland
• RE: Issues - misc John M Slatin
• Issues - misc Gregg Vanderheiden
• normative issues to close Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Scoping clarifications - rewording? John M Slatin
• Draft of WCAG Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Scoping clarifications - rewording? Gregg Vanderheiden

Monday, 20 March 2006

• Scoping clarifications Gregg Vanderheiden
• Edititorial change to conformance section Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: 16 March 2006 Minutes Paul Walsh, Segala
• Working group hours Gregg Vanderheiden

Sunday, 19 March 2006

• RE: SC 2.4.5: Good news about AT support John M Slatin

Saturday, 18 March 2006

• RE: SC 2.4.5: Good news about AT support Kelly Ford
• SC 2.4.5: Good news about AT support John M Slatin

Friday, 17 March 2006

• mailing list test David MacDonald
• RE: 16 March 2006 Minutes Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: 16 March 2006 Minutes Paul Walsh, Segala
• RE: 16 March 2006 Minutes Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: 16 March 2006 Minutes Paul Walsh, Segala
• RE: 16 March 2006 Minutes John M Slatin
• RE: 16 March 2006 Minutes Paul Walsh, Segala
• RE: 16 March 2006 Minutes John M Slatin
• RE: 16 March 2006 Minutes Paul Walsh, Segala
• R: 16 March 2006 Agenda =========================== Roberto Castaldo
• Re: 16 March 2006 Agenda - late regrets Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc. -
• 16 March 2006 Minutes Ben Caldwell

Thursday, 16 March 2006

• Re: 16 March 2006 Agenda =========================== Sebastiano Nutarelli (IWA/HWG)
• Updated Editor's Draft Ben Caldwell
• Re: 16 March 2006 Agenda - partial regrets Becky Gibson
• FW: EARL Gregg Vanderheiden
• 16 March 2006 Agenda =========================== Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: Survey - Team A Techniques for March 16 Ben Caldwell
• RE: Survey - Team A Techniques for March 16 Loretta Guarino Reid
• Survey - Team A Techniques for March 16 Ben Caldwell
• 4.1 issues Ben Caldwell

Wednesday, 15 March 2006

• Three new techniques for 4.1.2 Gregg Vanderheiden
• Proposal for HOW TO MEET 4.1.2 Gregg Vanderheiden
• Revised proposal for 4.1.2 Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Proposal to Delete or Keep 2.4.1 Loretta Guarino Reid
• RE: Proposal to Delete or Keep 2.4.1 John M Slatin
• RE: Proposal to Delete or Keep 2.4.1 Loretta Guarino Reid
• RE: Proposal to Delete or Keep 2.4.1 Michael Cooper
• Survey - Misc. Issues and Proposals for March 16 Ben Caldwell
• EARL Gregg Vanderheiden
• FW: programmatically determined Gregg Vanderheiden
• Please look over new 1.1.1 and its techniques. Gregg Vanderheiden
• 4.2 issues Ben Caldwell
• One more survey! Loretta Guarino Reid
• Regrets for 16 March telecon Christophe Strobbe
• RE: Issues from Microsoft ISSUE #1 Move 1.2.3 to level 3? Andrew Kirkpatrick

Tuesday, 14 March 2006

• RE: Issues from Microsoft ISSUE #1 Move 1.2.3 to level 3? Cynthia Shelly
• 2.4.5 David MacDonald
• Re: Baselines: how specific? Gez Lemon
• Re: Baselines: how specific? Christophe Strobbe
• Re: Proposal to Delete or Keep 2.4.1 Christophe Strobbe
• RE: Baselines: how specific? Tim Boland
• RE: Proposal to Delete or Keep 2.4.1 John M Slatin
• Re: Proposal to Delete or Keep 2.4.1 Loretta Guarino Reid
• RE: Baselines: how specific? John M Slatin
• RE: Baselines: how specific? Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: CONFORMANCE issues & resolutions -- based on new conformance section. Paul Walsh, Segala
• Re: CONFORMANCE issues & resolutions -- based on new conformance section. Shadi Abou-Zahra
• RE: CONFORMANCE issues & resolutions -- based on new conformance section. Paul Walsh, Segala
• Re: CONFORMANCE issues & resolutions -- based on new conformance section. Shadi Abou-Zahra
• Re: Baselines: how specific? Gez Lemon
• Baselines: how specific? Christophe Strobbe
• Re: Proposal to Delete or Keep 2.4.1 Christophe Strobbe
• Proposal to Delete or Keep 2.4.1 Gregg Vanderheiden

Monday, 13 March 2006

• RE: Reworking 1.1 Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Reworking 1.1 John M Slatin
• New survey on items 1.1 and 4.1 Gregg Vanderheiden
• Fixing 4.1 Gregg Vanderheiden
• Reworking 1.1 Gregg Vanderheiden
• Side Benefits Gregg Vanderheiden
• test David MacDonald
• RE: CONFORMANCE issues & resolutions -- based on new conformance section. Gregg Vanderheiden
• Describing the delivery unit in text immediately preceding the programmatic reference David MacDonald

Sunday, 12 March 2006

• RE: CONFORMANCE issues & resolutions -- based on new conformance section. David MacDonald
• RE: CONFORMANCE issues & resolutions -- based on new conformance section. Paul Walsh, Segala
• Re: New failure technique for 3.2.5: automatic updates Gez Lemon
• RE: New failure technique for 3.2.5: automatic updates Gregg Vanderheiden
• Proposal rev1 - Definition of Programmatically determined Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Proposal - Definition of Programmatically determined David MacDonald
• RE: CONFORMANCE issues & resolutions -- based on new conformance section. Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)
• Proposal - Definition of Programmatically determined Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: New failure technique for 3.2.5: automatic updates Gez Lemon
• Two more March 13 surveys Loretta Guarino Reid

Saturday, 11 March 2006

• RE: CONFORMANCE issues & resolutions -- based on new conformance section. Paul Walsh, Segala
• RE: Open Issue 486 - Synchronization WCAG with ACCLIP Specifications Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Open Issue 486 - Synchronization WCAG with ACCLIP Specifications John M Slatin
• RE: Issues from Microsoft ISSUE #2 Testability of Audio Descriptions Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Open Issue 486 - Synchronization WCAG with ACCLIP Specifications Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: New failure technique for 3.2.5: automatic updates Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Open Issue 486 - Synchronization WCAG with ACCLIP Specifications Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)
• PLEASE NOTE THAT THE SURVEY IS DUE BY MONDAY NIGHT - Gregg Vanderheiden
• Testing David MacDonald
• RE: Open Issue 486 - Synchronization WCAG with ACCLIP Specifications John M Slatin
• Remaining General Issues - survey for 13 March Ben Caldwell
• RE: Issues from Microsoft ISSUE #2 Testability of Audio Descriptions Cynthia Shelly

Friday, 10 March 2006

• Open Issue 486 - Synchronization WCAG with ACCLIP Specifications Gregg Vanderheiden
• 741 Please add Digital Rights Management and visual verification to issues list. Gregg Vanderheiden
• General Issues - Proposals to close Gregg Vanderheiden
• New failure technique for 3.2.5: automatic updates Cynthia Shelly
• RE: Issues from Microsoft - Issue #4 Cynthia Shelly
• RE: Issues from Microsoft - Issue #4 Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Issues from Microsoft Cynthia Shelly
• RE: Realtime caption tools? Gregg Vanderheiden
• FW: Realtime caption tools? Loretta Guarino Reid
• Late regrets: 09 March 2006 Agenda Roberto Castaldo
• RE: Issues from Microsoft Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: 09 March 2006 Minutes (complete) Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: 09 March 2006 Minutes (complete) Bailey, Bruce
• Issues from Microsoft Cynthia Shelly
• 09 March 2006 Minutes (complete) Ben Caldwell
• 09 March 2006 Minutes Ben Caldwell

Thursday, 9 March 2006

• Regrets: 09 March 2006 Agenda Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• Regrets: 09 March 2006 Agenda Roberto Ellero
• Regrets (RE: 09 March 2006 Agenda) Yvette Hoitink
• Re: Revised Conformance Section John M Slatin
• regrets Sorcha Moore
• RE: Wording of SC 1.3.5 Gregg Vanderheiden
• Wording of SC 1.3.5 Loretta Guarino Reid

Wednesday, 8 March 2006

• RE: Introduction Issues and proposals - survey for 09 March Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Introduction Issues and proposals - survey for 09 March Michael Cooper
• RE: CONTENT Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Just (almost plain) Web-page* Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Propose deleting failure for 3.2.5 Michael Cooper
• Introduction Issues and proposals - survey for 09 March Ben Caldwell
• RE: Just (almost plain) Web-page* Cynthia Shelly
• Conformance Issues and Proposals - survey for 09 March Ben Caldwell
• RE: CONTENT John M Slatin
• RE: Propose deleting failure for 3.2.5 Cynthia Shelly
• Partial regrets RE: 09 March 2006 Agenda Michael Cooper
• oops - missed a conformance item - miscategorized. Gregg Vanderheiden
• FW: 09 March 2006 Agenda Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Just (almost plain) Web-page* Michael Cooper
• RE: 4.1 work in progress Michael Cooper
• RE: Is using frames to group links a sufficient technique for 2.4.3? Michael Cooper
• RE: Propose deleting failure for 3.2.5 Michael Cooper
• Misc. propoasls from the list - survey for 09 March Ben Caldwell
• RE: Is using frames to group links a sufficient technique for 2.4.3? John M Slatin
• Revised Conformance Section Gregg Vanderheiden
• Just (almost plain) Web-page* Gregg Vanderheiden
• INTRODUCTIONS - issues and proposed resolutions Gregg Vanderheiden
• CONFORMANCE issues & resolutions -- based on new conformance section. Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: 4.1 work in progress Becky Gibson
• Re: propose we change element to component throughout Gez Lemon
• propose we change element to component throughout Gregg Vanderheiden
• regrets thursday David MacDonald
• Team B Survey for March 9 Loretta Guarino Reid
• Re: 4.1 work in progress Jason White
• Team A survey for 09 March Ben Caldwell
• Re: Web Pages (including Web Applications) Ben Caldwell
• RE: Web Pages (including Web Applications) Cynthia Shelly

Tuesday, 7 March 2006

• 4.1 work in progress Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Add at technique to 1.3.1 Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Propose deleting failure for 3.2.5 Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: 2.4.5 Proposal David MacDonald
• Add at technique to 1.3.1 Gregg Vanderheiden
• Is using frames to group links a sufficient technique for 2.4.3? Becky Gibson
• RE: Propose deleting failure for 3.2.5 Cynthia Shelly
• FW: Proposed wording for SC 1.3.1 Gregg Vanderheiden
• Web Pages (including Web Applications) Gregg Vanderheiden
• 2.4.5 Proposal Ben Caldwell
• SLIGHT EDIT TO 4.2.1 Gregg Vanderheiden
• New (proposed) SC 3.1.6 A mechanism is available for finding specific pronunciation of words where meaning cannot be determined without pronunciation. Loretta Guarino Reid
• Proposed wording for SC 1.3.1 Loretta Guarino Reid
• Survey from Team C Michael Cooper

Monday, 6 March 2006

• REAL-TIME Gregg Vanderheiden
• CONTENT Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Definition of idiom 2 Christophe Strobbe

Sunday, 5 March 2006

• RE: Definition of idiom 2 Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Definition of idiom 2 John M Slatin
• Definition of idiom 2 Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: Definition of idiom Gez Lemon
• RE: Definition of idiom Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Definition of idiom Christophe Strobbe

Friday, 3 March 2006

• RE: Definition of idiom John M Slatin
• RE: Definition of idiom Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Definition of idiom John M Slatin
• Re: Definition of idiom Christophe Strobbe
• Partial regrets for 2 March 2006 Yvette Hoitink
• Late Regrets: 02 March 2006 Agenda =========================================== Sebastiano Nutarelli (IWA/HWG)
• Definition of idiom John M Slatin
• 02 March 2006 Minutes Ben Caldwell

Thursday, 2 March 2006

• Partial Regrets -- Re: 02 March 2006 Agenda Judy Brewer
• partial regrets - Re: 02 March 2006 Agenda === Christophe Strobbe
• Regrets: 02 March 2006 Agenda =========================================== Roberto Castaldo
• Re: 02 March 2006 Agenda - partial regrets Becky Gibson
• RE: Propose deleting failure for 3.2.5 Cynthia Shelly
• Partial regrets: 02 March 2006 Agenda Cynthia Shelly
• Regrets, 02 March 2006 Agenda Sorcha Moore

Wednesday, 1 March 2006

• Long meeting again. 3 to 6 Eastern Gregg Vanderheiden
• 02 March 2006 Agenda =========================================== Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Propose deleting failure for 3.2.5 John M Slatin
• Proposed Glossary Revisions Ben Caldwell
• Questionaire available from Team B Ben Caldwell
• RE: Propose deleting failure for 3.2.5 John M Slatin
• RE: Propose deleting failure for 3.2.5 Michael Cooper
• Re: Propose deleting failure for 3.2.5 Ben Caldwell
• Re: Propose deleting failure for 3.2.5 Christophe Strobbe
• RE: Propose deleting failure for 3.2.5 Gregg Vanderheiden
• Propose deleting failure for 3.2.5 Cynthia Shelly

Tuesday, 28 February 2006

• proposal to change Delivery Unit to Web Page or other primary resource Gregg Vanderheiden
• New Proposed Glossary. Gregg Vanderheiden
• Questionaire available from Team B Loretta Guarino Reid
• RE: New Caption Definition - please comment Christophe Strobbe
• Questionnaire available from Team C Michael Cooper
• RE: New Caption Definition - please comment Yvette Hoitink

Monday, 27 February 2006

• RE: Words in context Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Words in context John M Slatin
• Re: New Caption Definition - please comment Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)
• RE: SC 2.4.5: links in context Gregg Vanderheiden
• text docs Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: SC 2.4.5: links in context John M Slatin

Sunday, 26 February 2006

• RE: Words in context Gregg Vanderheiden
• Real-time event - Definition Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Real-time events John M Slatin
• RE: Words in context John M Slatin
• Words in context Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: perceivable structures Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: New Caption Definition - please comment Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: programmatically determined Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: New Caption Definition - please comment Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc. -
• RE: New Caption Definition - please comment Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: New Caption Definition - please comment Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Real-time events Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: SC 2.4.5: links in context Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: About tests 37-41 (headers) Vicente Luque Centeno
• RE: About tests 37-41 (headers) Jim Thatcher

Monday, 27 February 2006

• RE: SC 2.4.5: links in context David MacDonald

Sunday, 26 February 2006

• RE: About tests 37-41 (headers) Vicente Luque Centeno
• RE: SC 2.4.5: links in context Gregg Vanderheiden

Saturday, 25 February 2006

• Re: SC 2.4.5: links in context Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc. -
• Updated Editor's drafts Ben Caldwell

Friday, 24 February 2006

• RE: Real-time events John M Slatin
• RE: SC 2.4.5: links in context John M Slatin
• RE: SC 2.4.5: links in context John M Slatin
• Re: SC 2.4.5: links in context Ben Caldwell
• Re: SC 2.4.5: links in context Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc. -
• Re: SC 2.4.5: links in context Becky Gibson
• Late regrets: 23 February 2006 Agenda ================================ Sebastiano Nutarelli (IWA/HWG)
• SC 2.4.5: links in context John M Slatin
• Regrets for March 2 WCAG WG meeting plus questions Tim Boland
• RE: Suggested edits for guidelines 1.4 CONTRAST Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: Suggested edits for guidelines 1.4 CONTRAST Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc. -
• RE: Real-time events Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• RE: New Caption Definition - please comment Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• RE: Real-time events Yvette Hoitink
• RE: New Caption Definition - please comment Yvette Hoitink
• Late regrets: 23 February 2006 Agenda ================================ Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc. -
• RE: New Caption Definition - please comment Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: New Caption Definition - please comment Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)
• Real-time events Gregg Vanderheiden

Thursday, 23 February 2006

• New Caption Definition - please comment Gregg Vanderheiden
• 23 Feb. 2006 Minutes Ben Caldwell
• Preview - Candidate Recommendation considerations Judy Brewer
• regrets: 23 February 2006 Agenda Roberto Ellero
• Regrets: 23 February 2006 Agenda ================================ Roberto Castaldo
• REMINDER - Meeting starts 1 hour early again. Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: 23 February 2006 Agenda ================================ Luca Mascaro
• RE: perceivable structures Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)

Wednesday, 22 February 2006

• RE: perceivable structures Loretta Guarino Reid
• RE: perceivable structures Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: perceivable structures Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: perceivable structures Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)
• RE: perceivable structures Gregg Vanderheiden
• PROPOSE - DELETE link DEFINITION Gregg Vanderheiden
• 23 February 2006 Agenda ================================ Gregg Vanderheiden
• Team B Surveys Loretta Guarino Reid
• Questionnaire for 2.2 techniques Michael Cooper

Thursday, 23 February 2006

• RE: Team B - hierarchy note David MacDonald

Wednesday, 22 February 2006

• Misc. 1.1, 2.3, 3.2 and 4.1 items from Team A (23 Feb.) Ben Caldwell
• RE: perceivable structures Tim Boland
• RE: Definition of baseline Christophe Strobbe
• RE: Definition of baseline David MacDonald
• RE: Definition of baseline Christophe Strobbe
• Re: perceivable structures Loretta Guarino Reid
• RE: perceivable structures Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Definition of baseline Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: perceivable structures Tim Boland
• Re: programmatically determined Tim Boland
• RE: link DEFINITION David MacDonald
• RE: Definition of baseline David MacDonald
• RE: Definition of baseline David MacDonald
• RE: Definition of baseline Christophe Strobbe
• Re: link DEFINITION Christophe Strobbe
• RE: Definition of baseline Gregg Vanderheiden
• GLOSSARY Gregg Vanderheiden
• DROP unfamiliar content Gregg Vanderheiden
• programmatically determined Gregg Vanderheiden
• perceivable structures Gregg Vanderheiden
• Definition Nesting Gregg Vanderheiden
• link DEFINITION Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: Definition of baseline Kerstin Goldsmith
• 2.3 Suggested edits for guidelines 2.3 on Seizure disorders Gregg Vanderheiden
• Suggested edits for guidelines 1.4 CONTRAST Gregg Vanderheiden
• Definition of baseline Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: About tests 37-41 (headers) Sailesh Panchang

Tuesday, 21 February 2006

• RE: About tests 37-41 (headers) Jim Thatcher
• Re: About tests 37-41 (headers) Ben Caldwell
• Re: About tests 37-41 (headers) Chris Ridpath
• Re: About tests 37-41 (headers) Johannes Koch
• RE: feedback on Web Unit Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: About tests 37-41 (headers) Jim Thatcher
• feedback on Web Unit Kerstin Goldsmith

Monday, 20 February 2006

• RE: About tests 37-41 (headers) David MacDonald
• Re: About tests 37-41 (headers) Loretta Guarino Reid
• RE: About tests 37-41 (headers) Gregg Vanderheiden
• About tests 37-41 (headers) Vicente Luque Centeno

Friday, 17 February 2006

• FYI: Approaching deadlines for Comments on European Activities Related to Web Accessibility Judy Brewer
• Re: Regrets - Re: 16 February 2006 Agenda ======================================== Sebastiano Nutarelli (IWA/HWG)

Thursday, 16 February 2006

• 16 Feb. 2006 Minutes Ben Caldwell
• Regrets - Re: 16 February 2006 Agenda ======================================== Marco Bertoni
• Regrets: 16 February 2006 Agenda ======================================== Roberto Castaldo
• Regrets - Re: 16 February 2006 Agenda Becky Gibson
• Re: 16 February 2006 Agenda ======================================== Luca Mascaro

Wednesday, 15 February 2006

• Re: 16 February 2006 Agenda ======================================== Katie Haritos-Shea
• RE: Definition of "technology": proposed modification Gregg Vanderheiden
• Survey for 1.3 and 2.4 Loretta Guarino Reid
• Survey for 2.1 and 2.2 Michael Cooper
• Re: Definition of "technology": proposed modification Tim Boland
• RE: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units Jason White
• new sufficient technique for 2.3.1 Gregg Vanderheiden
• 16 February 2006 Agenda ======================================== Gregg Vanderheiden
• 1.1 Survey Ben Caldwell

Tuesday, 14 February 2006

• RE: REwrite of 1.1.6 Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: REwrite of 1.1.6 David MacDonald
• RE: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units Tim Boland
• RE: REwrite of 1.1.6 John M Slatin
• iframes technique for script based web applications Lisa Seeman
• Re: Why an standalone image shall conform to WCAG 2.0? (was Re: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units) Johannes Koch
• RE: REwrite of 1.1.6 David MacDonald
• RE: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units Gregg Vanderheiden

Monday, 13 February 2006

• Re: Content Negotiation (was: Why an standalone image shall conform to WCAG 2.0?) Johannes Koch
• Re: Why an standalone image shall conform to WCAG 2.0? (was Re: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units) Carlos A Velasco
• Re: Why an standalone image shall conform to WCAG 2.0? (was Re: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units) Carlos A Velasco
• RE: Content Negotiation (was: Why an standalone image shall conform to WCAG 2.0?) Gregg Vanderheiden
• Definition of "technology": proposed modification John M Slatin
• Content Negotiation (was: Why an standalone image shall conform to WCAG 2.0?) Johannes Koch
• RE: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units Bailey, Bruce
• RE: Why an standalone image shall conform to WCAG 2.0? (was Re: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units) Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Why an standalone image shall conform to WCAG 2.0? (was Re: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units) Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: Why an standalone image shall conform to WCAG 2.0? (was Re: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units) Carlos A Velasco
• RE: Why an standalone image shall conform to WCAG 2.0? (was Re: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units) Yvette Hoitink
• Why an standalone image shall conform to WCAG 2.0? (was Re: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units) Carlos A Velasco
• RE: REwrite of 1.1.6 Andrew Kirkpatrick

Sunday, 12 February 2006

• RE: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units Bailey, Bruce
• RE: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: REwrite of 1.1.6 David MacDonald
• Re: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units Carlos A Velasco
• RE: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units - Better term? Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units - Better term? Jason White
• RE: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units - Better term? Gregg Vanderheiden

Saturday, 11 February 2006

• RE: REwrite of 1.1.6 David MacDonald
• Re: REwrite of 1.1.6 Loretta Guarino Reid
• Re: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units - Better term? Johannes Koch
• RE: REwrite of 1.1.6 David MacDonald
• RE: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units - Better term? Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: REwrite of 1.1.6 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: REwrite of 1.1.6 Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: Longdesc (was Re: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units) 'Jason White'

Friday, 10 February 2006

• RE: REwrite of 1.1.6 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: REwrite of 1.1.6 David MacDonald
• Re: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units Carlos A Velasco
• RE: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units Bailey, Bruce
• Re: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units Johannes Koch
• RE: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: REwrite of 1.1.6 Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units Bailey, Bruce
• RE: REwrite of 1.1.6 Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: caption addition Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units Paul Walsh, Segala
• Re: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units Carlos A Velasco
• Re: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units Johannes Koch
• caption addition Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Longdesc (was Re: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units) Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: collated transcript technique Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units Bailey, Bruce
• Re: BIG ISSUE -- TAKE 2 on WEB UNIT Jason White

Thursday, 9 February 2006

• Re: Longdesc (was Re: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units) 'Jason White'
• 09 February 2006 Minutes Ben Caldwell
• collated transcript technique David MacDonald
• RE: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units Bailey, Bruce
• RE: Joint WAI Working group Teleconference for 9 February 2006 John M Slatin
• Regrets: 09 February 2006 Agenda ========================== Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)
• Regrets: 09 February 2006 Agenda ========================== Roberto Castaldo
• RE: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: RELATED ISSUE AUTHORED UNIT Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: 3.2.4 edit? Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units Johannes Koch
• RE: 3.2.4 edit? Bailey, Bruce
• RE: RELATED ISSUE AUTHORED UNIT Bailey, Bruce
• RE: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units Bailey, Bruce
• RE: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: BIG ISSUE -- TAKE 2 on WEB UNIT Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: BIG ISSUE -- TAKE 2 on WEB UNIT - RATIONALE Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Longdesc (was Re: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units) Gregg Vanderheiden
• Longdesc (was Re: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units) Jason White
• Re: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units Jason White
• RE: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units David MacDonald
• RE: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: 3.2.4 edit? Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: RELATED ISSUE AUTHORED UNIT Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: 09 February 2006 Agenda ========================== Andi Snow-Weaver
• one more survey (sorry for the late notice) Loretta Guarino Reid
• FW: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units Bailey, Bruce
• RE: 3.2.4 edit? Bailey, Bruce
• RE: RELATED ISSUE AUTHORED UNIT Bailey, Bruce
• Glossary Issues Survey Ben Caldwell

Wednesday, 8 February 2006

• REwrite of 1.1.6 Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: Scripting techniques for review Sofia.Celic@nils.org.au
• Glossary issues Ben Caldwell
• RELATED ISSUE AUTHORED UNIT Gregg Vanderheiden
• BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: 3.2.4 edit? Kerstin Goldsmith
• 3.2.4 edit? Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: MEETING STARTS 1 hour early again this week. (thursday) Kerstin Goldsmith
• Re: 09 February 2006 Agenda ========================== Sebastiano Nutarelli (IWA/HWG)
• 09 February 2006 Agenda ========================== Gregg Vanderheiden
• MEETING STARTS 1 hour early again this week. (thursday) Gregg Vanderheiden
• Surveys for GL 1.3, 2.4 Loretta Guarino Reid

Monday, 6 February 2006

• regrets for 9 February 2006 WCAG WG teleconference Tim Boland

Friday, 3 February 2006

• RE: issue 741 Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: Regrets: 02 February 2006 Agenda ===================================== Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc. -
• Re: Regrets: 02 February 2006 Agenda ===================================== Sebastiano Nutarelli (IWA/HWG)
• 02 February 2006 Minutes (with URI) Ben Caldwell

Thursday, 2 February 2006

• 02 February 2006 Minutes Ben Caldwell
• Joint WAI Working group Teleconference for 9 February 2006 Jim Allan
• Re: Partial regrets RE: 02 February 2006 Agenda ===================================== Kerstin Goldsmith
• Partial regrets RE: 02 February 2006 Agenda ===================================== Cynthia Shelly
• Regrets: 02 February 2006 Agenda ===================================== Roberto Castaldo
• issue 741 Kerstin Goldsmith

Wednesday, 1 February 2006

• Re: Scripting techniques for review Gez Lemon
• Scripting techniques for review Becky Gibson
• Surveys for this week Ben Caldwell
• Note that this weeks meeting is scheduled to start one hour earlier than our previous meeting time and will run for 3 - 3.5 hrs. Gregg Vanderheiden
• 02 February 2006 Agenda ===================================== Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: proposed enhanced definition for caption Gregg Vanderheiden
• Proposals for 3.2.2 Ben Caldwell

Tuesday, 31 January 2006

• Re: proposed enhanced definition for caption Tim Boland
• proposed enhanced definition for caption Loretta Guarino Reid
• Action Item: caption failure Loretta Guarino Reid

Monday, 30 January 2006

• RE: Action item: resources on sign language video Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• RE: Action item: resources on sign language video John M Slatin
• RE: Action item: resources on sign language video Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)

Sunday, 29 January 2006

• Action item: resources on sign language video John M Slatin
• RE: regrets for next week teleconf Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)

Saturday, 28 January 2006

• RE: regrets for next week teleconf Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: Web authoring statistics by Google Jim Ley
• Web authoring statistics by Google Yvette Hoitink
• regrets for next week teleconf Luca Mascaro

Friday, 27 January 2006

• Next weeks meeting starting 1 hour earlier and going 3 to 3.5 hrs Gregg Vanderheiden

Thursday, 26 January 2006

• RE: parent child relationships in Wiki Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: parent child relationships in Wiki David MacDonald
• Regrets: 26 January 2006 Agenda ======================================== Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)
• RE: parent child relationships in Wiki Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: parent child relationships in Wiki Gregg Vanderheiden
• Regrets: 26 January 2006 Agenda ======================================== Roberto Castaldo
• Re: 26 January 2006 Agenda ======================================== Sebastiano Nutarelli (IWA/HWG)
• Re: parent child relationships in Wiki Loretta Guarino Reid
• Re: 26 January 2006 Agenda ======================================== sorcha@segala.com
• RE: parent child relationships in Wiki David MacDonald
• RE: parent child relationships in Wiki - other questions Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: programmatically determined and AT Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: parent child relationships in Wiki Gregg Vanderheiden

Wednesday, 25 January 2006

• 26 January Open issues and techniques for Guideline 1.1 Ben Caldwell
• parent child relationships in Wiki David MacDonald
• RE: programmatically determined and AT Christophe Strobbe
• 26 January Open issues and techniques for Guideline 2.3 Ben Caldwell
• RE: programmatically determined and AT Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Need to have a "technology independent" heading in the GL Gregg Vanderheiden
• 2.3 Issue Cleanup - Revisited Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: Need to have a "technology independent" heading in the GL Loretta Guarino Reid
• RE: Need to have a "technology independent" heading in the GL David MacDonald
• programmatically determined and AT Christophe Strobbe
• 26 January Open issues and techniques for Guideline 1.4 Ben Caldwell
• RE: Need to have a "technology independent" heading in the GL Gregg Vanderheiden
• 26 January 2006 Agenda ======================================== Gregg Vanderheiden
• 26 January Open issues and techniques for Guideline 1.2 Ben Caldwell
• 2.3 Issue Cleanup Gregg Vanderheiden
• Clearing Issues for 1.4 Gregg Vanderheiden

Tuesday, 24 January 2006

• RE: 1.2 issue Gregg Vanderheiden
• Need to have a "technology independent" heading in the GL David MacDonald
• Survey of techniques for SC 1.3.1 Loretta Guarino Reid
• RE: 1.2 issue Andrew Kirkpatrick
• WCAG-DI consistency of "perceivable unit" and "user agent" definitions? Tim Boland
• FW: 1.2 issue Gregg Vanderheiden

Monday, 23 January 2006

• RE: SMIL experts Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: SMIL experts Andrew Kirkpatrick

Sunday, 22 January 2006

• SMIL experts Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: SMIL TECHNIQUE Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: SMIL TECHNIQUE Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG
• RE: SMIL TECHNIQUE Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG

Saturday, 21 January 2006

• SMIL TECHNIQUE Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: Tehcnique for 1.1.1 Using the body of the applet element Luca Mascaro
• RE: Tehcnique for 1.1.1 Using the body of the applet element David MacDonald
• RE: Tehcnique for 1.1.1 Using the body of the applet element Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)
• Tehcnique for 1.1.1 Using the body of the applet element Gregg Vanderheiden
• New bullet for 2.2.1 to account for session timeouts Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: [Bugzilla WCAG Issue 1680] alt text for linked images (1) Johannes Koch

Friday, 20 January 2006

• Concerns with SC 4.1.2 and dynamic HTML components Becky Gibson
• RE: Session timeouts not part of 2.2.1? Christophe Strobbe
• New or revised techniques for 3.1 and 1.1 Christophe Strobbe
• Late regrets - Re: 17 January 2006 Agenda ==== Christophe Strobbe
• Re: 17 January 2006 Agenda Roberto Ellero
• Re: Regrets: 17 January 2006 Agenda ======================================= Luca Mascaro

Thursday, 19 January 2006

• Link to UW Katie Haritos-Shea

Friday, 20 January 2006

• RE: Link to UW Gregg Vanderheiden

Thursday, 19 January 2006

• 19 January Minutes Ben Caldwell
• Link to UW Katie Haritos-Shea
• Do we need to think about Ink ML in relation to Images or Otherwise for WCAG 2? Katie Haritos-Shea
• Regrets: 17 January 2006 Agenda ======================================= Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)
• Regrets: 17 January 2006 Agenda ======================================= Roberto Castaldo
• Regrets - no message (Was: RE: 17 January 2006 Agenda =======================================) Yvette Hoitink
• Re: 17 January 2006 Agenda ======================================= Sebastiano Nutarelli (IWA/HWG)
• 17 January 2006 Agenda ======================================= Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Techniques Task Force Meeting Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: Techniques Task Force Meeting Kerstin Goldsmith

Wednesday, 18 January 2006

• Techniques Task Force Meeting Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Proposal for Drafting committee Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: Proposal for Drafting committee Lisa Seeman

Tuesday, 17 January 2006

• Updated Editor's drafts Ben Caldwell
• Tentativedates for next WCAG WG face to face John M Slatin
• Re: Issues and recommendations - BATCH 1 Survey Ben Caldwell
• Re: Fw: Real show Wendy Chisholm
• Issues and recommendations - BATCH 1 Survey Ben Caldwell
• RE: Technology-specific techniques Gregg Vanderheiden

Monday, 16 January 2006

• RE: Next meetings? Bruno von Niman \(ANEC W3C\)
• Technology-specific techniques Loretta Guarino Reid
• RE: Next meetings? Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)
• RE: Next meetings? Gregg Vanderheiden
• Next meetings? Lisa Seeman

Sunday, 15 January 2006

• late regrets for TH call Kerstin Goldsmith
• Re: a serouse issue at hand was: Re: [action] Reasons for not moving SC 3.2.2 up to level 1 Lisa Seeman

Friday, 13 January 2006

• Re: technique to overcome meaningful link text Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)
• Re: technique to overcome meaningful link text Johannes Koch
• Updated mapping WCAG 1.0 - WCAG 2.0 Christophe Strobbe
• Re: technique to overcome meaningful link text donaldfevans@aol.com
• RE: technique to overcome meaningful link text John M Slatin
• Re: technique to overcome meaningful link text Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)
• RE: technique to overcome meaningful link text David MacDonald
• RE: technique to overcome meaningful link text John M Slatin
• Re: technique to overcome meaningful link text donaldfevans@aol.com
• Re: technique to overcome meaningful link text Loretta Guarino Reid
• RE: Session timeouts not part of 2.2.1? Christophe Strobbe
• RE: technique to overcome meaningful link text Michael Cooper
• technique to overcome meaningful link text David MacDonald

Thursday, 12 January 2006

• 12 January 2006 Minutes Ben Caldwell
• technique to overcome meaningful link text David MacDonald
• RE: a serouse issue at hand was: Re: [action] Reasons for not moving SC 3.2.2 up to level 1 Gregg Vanderheiden
• Proposal for Drafting committee Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Session timeouts not part of 2.2.1? Michael Cooper
• Regrets: 12 January 2006 Agenda ======================================= Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)
• Regrets: 12 January 2006 Agenda ======================================= Roberto Castaldo
• a serouse issue at hand was: Re: [action] Reasons for not moving SC 3.2.2 up to level 1 Lisa Seeman
• RE: programatically determineds Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: [action] Reasons for not moving SC 3.2.2 up to level 1 Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: 12 January 2006 Agenda ======================================= Sebastiano Nutarelli (IWA/HWG)
• Re: Session timeouts not part of 2.2.1? Christophe Strobbe
• Re: [action] Reasons for not moving SC 3.2.2 up to level 1 Lisa Seeman
• Re: programatically determineds Lisa Seeman

Wednesday, 11 January 2006

• RE: Technique boilerplate Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: 12 January 2006 Agenda ======================================= Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: 12 January 2006 Agenda ======================================= Loretta Guarino Reid
• Re: Session timeouts not part of 2.2.1? Ben Caldwell
• GL 1.3 Survey for tomorrow's teleconference available Loretta Guarino Reid
• Re: Session timeouts not part of 2.2.1? Christophe Strobbe
• Session timeouts not part of 2.2.1? Michael Cooper
• 12 January 2006 Agenda ======================================= Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Technique boilerplate boland@nist.gov
• RE: Technique boilerplate Gregg Vanderheiden
• Technique boilerplate Loretta Guarino Reid

Monday, 9 January 2006

• Re: [action] Reasons for not moving SC 3.2.2 up to level 1 Gez Lemon
• [action] Reasons for not moving SC 3.2.2 up to level 1 Becky Gibson

Sunday, 8 January 2006

• RE: Tab panel example for SC 3.2.1 Sofia.Celic@nils.org.au
• The Need for Descriptive Text for Links David MacDonald

Friday, 6 January 2006

• RE: programatically determineds John M Slatin
• programatically determineds Kerstin Goldsmith
• Meaningful links 2.4.5 David MacDonald
• RE: Bug 1649 Definition of "Programmatic Reference" David MacDonald
• RE: Bug 1649 Definition of "Programmatic Reference" Andrew Kirkpatrick
• RE: Bug 1649 Definition of "Programmatic Reference" David MacDonald
• RE: Tab panel example for SC 3.2.1 Becky Gibson
• Re: Bug 1649 Definition of "Programmatic Reference" Christophe Strobbe
• Re: proposal for removing guideline 3 (and working on it after last call as an extension) Sofia.Celic@nils.org.au
• RE: Tab panel example for SC 3.2.1 Sofia.Celic@nils.org.au
• Bug 1649 Definition of "Programmatic Reference" David MacDonald

Thursday, 5 January 2006

• 05 January 2006 Minutes Ben Caldwell
• addition to definition of "delivery unit". David MacDonald
• Regrets: 05 January 2006 Agenda Roberto Ellero
• Regrets - Re: 05 January 2006 Agenda ================================== Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)
• Regrets - Re: 05 January 2006 Agenda ================================== Gez Lemon
• One more survey! Loretta Guarino Reid
• RE: SC 2.4.5, meaningful link text John M Slatin
• RE: SC 2.4.5, meaningful link text Michael Cooper
• RE: SC 2.4.5, meaningful link text David MacDonald
• Regrets WATANABE Takayuki
• RE: Tab panel example for SC 3.2.1 Becky Gibson
• Regrets Sebastiano Nutarelli (IWA/HWG)
• RE: Tab panel example for SC 3.2.1 Sofia.Celic@nils.org.au
• RE: SC 2.4.5, meaningful link text Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: SC 2.4.5, meaningful link text David MacDonald

Wednesday, 4 January 2006

• Re: SC 2.4.5, meaningful link text Ben Caldwell
• FW: proposal for removing guideline 3 (and working on it after last call as an extension) Gregg Vanderheiden
• Draft Techniques for Guideline 1.1. Survey Available Ben Caldwell
• GL 1.3 survey available Loretta Guarino Reid
• 05 January 2006 Agenda ================================== Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Tab panel example for SC 3.2.1 Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: Instructions and team assignments for getting to Last Call Chris Ridpath
• Happy Birthday Louis Braille donaldfevans@aol.com
• Re: Tab panel example for SC 3.2.1 Gez Lemon
• RE: Tab panel example for SC 3.2.1 Becky Gibson
• RE: Tab panel example for SC 3.2.1 Gregg Vanderheiden
• Issues and recommendations - BATCH 1 Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Tab panel example for SC 3.2.1 Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Example for SC 3.2.2 Gregg Vanderheiden
• RE: Instructions and team assignments for getting to Last Call Gregg Vanderheiden

Tuesday, 3 January 2006

• Summary of New Issues from 23 November 2005 WD Ben Caldwell
• recommendation for bug #1741 SC 2.4.2 David MacDonald
• Example for SC 3.2.2 Becky Gibson
• Tab panel example for SC 3.2.1 Becky Gibson
• RE: Instructions and team assignments for getting to Last Call Tim Boland
• proposal for removing guideline 3 (and working on it after last call as an extension) Lisa Seeman
• Re: SC 2.4.5, meaningful link text Jason White

Monday, 2 January 2006

• RE: SC 2.4.5, meaningful link text Gregg Vanderheiden
• Re: FW: Action Items Christophe Strobbe
• RE: SC 2.4.5, meaningful link text David MacDonald
• RE: SC 2.4.5, meaningful link text Gregg Vanderheiden

Sunday, 1 January 2006

• RE: SC 2.4.5, meaningful link text David MacDonald
• RE: SC 2.4.5, meaningful link text Gregg Vanderheiden

Last message date: Friday, 31 March 2006 11:57:31 UTC