w3c-wai-gl@w3.org from January to March 2006 by author

'Jason White'

• Re: Longdesc (was Re: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units) (Saturday, 11 February)
• Re: Longdesc (was Re: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units) (Thursday, 9 February)

Andi Snow-Weaver

• Re: 09 February 2006 Agenda ========================== (Thursday, 9 February)

Andrew Kirkpatrick

• RE: Issues from Microsoft ISSUE #1 Move 1.2.3 to level 3? (Wednesday, 15 March)
• RE: REwrite of 1.1.6 (Monday, 13 February)
• RE: REwrite of 1.1.6 (Saturday, 11 February)
• RE: REwrite of 1.1.6 (Friday, 10 February)
• RE: REwrite of 1.1.6 (Friday, 10 February)
• RE: caption addition (Friday, 10 February)
• RE: 1.2 issue (Tuesday, 24 January)
• RE: SMIL experts (Monday, 23 January)
• RE: Bug 1649 Definition of "Programmatic Reference" (Friday, 6 January)

Bailey, Bruce

• RE: 1.1 level 3 SC (Wednesday, 29 March)
• RE: normative issues to close (Tuesday, 21 March)
• RE: 09 March 2006 Minutes (complete) (Friday, 10 March)
• RE: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units (Sunday, 12 February)
• RE: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units (Friday, 10 February)
• RE: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units (Friday, 10 February)
• RE: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units (Friday, 10 February)
• RE: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units (Thursday, 9 February)
• RE: 3.2.4 edit? (Thursday, 9 February)
• RE: RELATED ISSUE AUTHORED UNIT (Thursday, 9 February)
• RE: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units (Thursday, 9 February)
• FW: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units (Thursday, 9 February)
• RE: 3.2.4 edit? (Thursday, 9 February)
• RE: RELATED ISSUE AUTHORED UNIT (Thursday, 9 February)

Becky Gibson

• Re: 23 March 2006 Agenda =probably regrets (Thursday, 23 March)
• Re: 16 March 2006 Agenda - partial regrets (Thursday, 16 March)
• Re: 4.1 work in progress (Wednesday, 8 March)
• Is using frames to group links a sufficient technique for 2.4.3? (Tuesday, 7 March)
• Re: 02 March 2006 Agenda - partial regrets (Thursday, 2 March)
• Re: SC 2.4.5: links in context (Friday, 24 February)
• Regrets - Re: 16 February 2006 Agenda (Thursday, 16 February)
• Scripting techniques for review (Wednesday, 1 February)
• Concerns with SC 4.1.2 and dynamic HTML components (Friday, 20 January)
• [action] Reasons for not moving SC 3.2.2 up to level 1 (Monday, 9 January)
• RE: Tab panel example for SC 3.2.1 (Friday, 6 January)
• RE: Tab panel example for SC 3.2.1 (Thursday, 5 January)
• RE: Tab panel example for SC 3.2.1 (Wednesday, 4 January)
• Example for SC 3.2.2 (Tuesday, 3 January)
• Tab panel example for SC 3.2.1 (Tuesday, 3 January)

Ben Caldwell

• 30 March 2006 Minutes (Thursday, 30 March)
• Understanding Guideline Drafts - Survey available (Wednesday, 29 March)
• 27 March 2006 Editor's Draft Published (Tuesday, 28 March)
• 23 March 2006 Minutes (Thursday, 23 March)
• 2-question survey for tomorrow (Wednesday, 22 March)
• Surveys for 23 March (Tuesday, 21 March)
• 16 March 2006 Minutes (Friday, 17 March)
• Updated Editor's Draft (Thursday, 16 March)
• Re: Survey - Team A Techniques for March 16 (Thursday, 16 March)
• Survey - Team A Techniques for March 16 (Thursday, 16 March)
• 4.1 issues (Thursday, 16 March)
• Survey - Misc. Issues and Proposals for March 16 (Wednesday, 15 March)
• 4.2 issues (Wednesday, 15 March)
• Remaining General Issues - survey for 13 March (Saturday, 11 March)
• 09 March 2006 Minutes (complete) (Friday, 10 March)
• 09 March 2006 Minutes (Friday, 10 March)
• Introduction Issues and proposals - survey for 09 March (Wednesday, 8 March)
• Conformance Issues and Proposals - survey for 09 March (Wednesday, 8 March)
• Misc. propoasls from the list - survey for 09 March (Wednesday, 8 March)
• Team A survey for 09 March (Wednesday, 8 March)
• Re: Web Pages (including Web Applications) (Wednesday, 8 March)
• 2.4.5 Proposal (Tuesday, 7 March)
• 02 March 2006 Minutes (Friday, 3 March)
• Proposed Glossary Revisions (Wednesday, 1 March)
• Questionaire available from Team B (Wednesday, 1 March)
• Re: Propose deleting failure for 3.2.5 (Wednesday, 1 March)
• Updated Editor's drafts (Saturday, 25 February)
• Re: SC 2.4.5: links in context (Friday, 24 February)
• 23 Feb. 2006 Minutes (Thursday, 23 February)
• Misc. 1.1, 2.3, 3.2 and 4.1 items from Team A (23 Feb.) (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: About tests 37-41 (headers) (Tuesday, 21 February)
• 16 Feb. 2006 Minutes (Thursday, 16 February)
• 1.1 Survey (Wednesday, 15 February)
• 09 February 2006 Minutes (Thursday, 9 February)
• Glossary Issues Survey (Thursday, 9 February)
• Glossary issues (Wednesday, 8 February)
• 02 February 2006 Minutes (with URI) (Friday, 3 February)
• 02 February 2006 Minutes (Thursday, 2 February)
• Surveys for this week (Wednesday, 1 February)
• Proposals for 3.2.2 (Wednesday, 1 February)
• 26 January Open issues and techniques for Guideline 1.1 (Wednesday, 25 January)
• 26 January Open issues and techniques for Guideline 2.3 (Wednesday, 25 January)
• 26 January Open issues and techniques for Guideline 1.4 (Wednesday, 25 January)
• 26 January Open issues and techniques for Guideline 1.2 (Wednesday, 25 January)
• 19 January Minutes (Thursday, 19 January)
• Updated Editor's drafts (Tuesday, 17 January)
• Re: Issues and recommendations - BATCH 1 Survey (Tuesday, 17 January)
• Issues and recommendations - BATCH 1 Survey (Tuesday, 17 January)
• 12 January 2006 Minutes (Thursday, 12 January)
• Re: Session timeouts not part of 2.2.1? (Wednesday, 11 January)
• 05 January 2006 Minutes (Thursday, 5 January)
• Re: SC 2.4.5, meaningful link text (Wednesday, 4 January)
• Draft Techniques for Guideline 1.1. Survey Available (Wednesday, 4 January)
• Summary of New Issues from 23 November 2005 WD (Tuesday, 3 January)

boland@nist.gov

• RE: Technique boilerplate (Wednesday, 11 January)

Bruno von Niman \(ANEC W3C\)

• RE: Next meetings? (Monday, 16 January)

Carlos A Velasco

• Re: Why an standalone image shall conform to WCAG 2.0? (was Re: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units) (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: Why an standalone image shall conform to WCAG 2.0? (was Re: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units) (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: Why an standalone image shall conform to WCAG 2.0? (was Re: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units) (Monday, 13 February)
• Why an standalone image shall conform to WCAG 2.0? (was Re: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units) (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units (Sunday, 12 February)
• Re: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units (Friday, 10 February)
• Re: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units (Friday, 10 February)

Chris Ridpath

• Re: About tests 37-41 (headers) (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: Instructions and team assignments for getting to Last Call (Wednesday, 4 January)

Christophe Strobbe

• Re: 23 March 2006 Agenda ======== (Thursday, 23 March)
• Regrets for 16 March telecon (Wednesday, 15 March)
• Re: Baselines: how specific? (Tuesday, 14 March)
• Re: Proposal to Delete or Keep 2.4.1 (Tuesday, 14 March)
• Baselines: how specific? (Tuesday, 14 March)
• Re: Proposal to Delete or Keep 2.4.1 (Tuesday, 14 March)
• RE: Definition of idiom 2 (Monday, 6 March)
• RE: Definition of idiom (Sunday, 5 March)
• Re: Definition of idiom (Friday, 3 March)
• partial regrets - Re: 02 March 2006 Agenda === (Thursday, 2 March)
• Re: Propose deleting failure for 3.2.5 (Wednesday, 1 March)
• RE: New Caption Definition - please comment (Tuesday, 28 February)
• RE: Definition of baseline (Wednesday, 22 February)
• RE: Definition of baseline (Wednesday, 22 February)
• RE: Definition of baseline (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: link DEFINITION (Wednesday, 22 February)
• RE: programmatically determined and AT (Wednesday, 25 January)
• programmatically determined and AT (Wednesday, 25 January)
• RE: Session timeouts not part of 2.2.1? (Friday, 20 January)
• New or revised techniques for 3.1 and 1.1 (Friday, 20 January)
• Late regrets - Re: 17 January 2006 Agenda ==== (Friday, 20 January)
• Updated mapping WCAG 1.0 - WCAG 2.0 (Friday, 13 January)
• RE: Session timeouts not part of 2.2.1? (Friday, 13 January)
• Re: Session timeouts not part of 2.2.1? (Thursday, 12 January)
• Re: Session timeouts not part of 2.2.1? (Wednesday, 11 January)
• Re: Bug 1649 Definition of "Programmatic Reference" (Friday, 6 January)
• Re: FW: Action Items (Monday, 2 January)

Cynthia Shelly

• Re: Partial Regrets (Thursday, 30 March)
• Partial Regrets (Thursday, 30 March)
• RE: Issues from Microsoft ISSUE #1 Move 1.2.3 to level 3? (Tuesday, 14 March)
• RE: Issues from Microsoft ISSUE #2 Testability of Audio Descriptions (Saturday, 11 March)
• New failure technique for 3.2.5: automatic updates (Friday, 10 March)
• RE: Issues from Microsoft - Issue #4 (Friday, 10 March)
• RE: Issues from Microsoft (Friday, 10 March)
• Issues from Microsoft (Friday, 10 March)
• RE: Just (almost plain) Web-page* (Wednesday, 8 March)
• RE: Propose deleting failure for 3.2.5 (Wednesday, 8 March)
• RE: Web Pages (including Web Applications) (Wednesday, 8 March)
• RE: Propose deleting failure for 3.2.5 (Tuesday, 7 March)
• RE: Propose deleting failure for 3.2.5 (Thursday, 2 March)
• Partial regrets: 02 March 2006 Agenda (Thursday, 2 March)
• Propose deleting failure for 3.2.5 (Wednesday, 1 March)
• Partial regrets RE: 02 February 2006 Agenda ===================================== (Thursday, 2 February)

David MacDonald

• mailing list test (Friday, 17 March)
• 2.4.5 (Tuesday, 14 March)
• test (Monday, 13 March)
• Describing the delivery unit in text immediately preceding the programmatic reference (Monday, 13 March)
• RE: CONFORMANCE issues & resolutions -- based on new conformance section. (Sunday, 12 March)
• RE: Proposal - Definition of Programmatically determined (Sunday, 12 March)
• Testing (Saturday, 11 March)
• regrets thursday (Wednesday, 8 March)
• Re: 2.4.5 Proposal (Tuesday, 7 March)
• RE: SC 2.4.5: links in context (Monday, 27 February)
• RE: Team B - hierarchy note (Thursday, 23 February)
• RE: Definition of baseline (Wednesday, 22 February)
• RE: link DEFINITION (Wednesday, 22 February)
• RE: Definition of baseline (Wednesday, 22 February)
• RE: Definition of baseline (Wednesday, 22 February)
• RE: About tests 37-41 (headers) (Monday, 20 February)
• RE: REwrite of 1.1.6 (Tuesday, 14 February)
• RE: REwrite of 1.1.6 (Tuesday, 14 February)
• RE: REwrite of 1.1.6 (Sunday, 12 February)
• RE: REwrite of 1.1.6 (Saturday, 11 February)
• RE: REwrite of 1.1.6 (Saturday, 11 February)
• RE: REwrite of 1.1.6 (Friday, 10 February)
• collated transcript technique (Thursday, 9 February)
• RE: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units (Thursday, 9 February)
• RE: parent child relationships in Wiki (Thursday, 26 January)
• RE: parent child relationships in Wiki (Thursday, 26 January)
• parent child relationships in Wiki (Wednesday, 25 January)
• RE: Need to have a "technology independent" heading in the GL (Wednesday, 25 January)
• Need to have a "technology independent" heading in the GL (Tuesday, 24 January)
• RE: Tehcnique for 1.1.1 Using the body of the applet element (Saturday, 21 January)
• RE: technique to overcome meaningful link text (Friday, 13 January)
• technique to overcome meaningful link text (Friday, 13 January)
• technique to overcome meaningful link text (Thursday, 12 January)
• The Need for Descriptive Text for Links (Sunday, 8 January)
• Meaningful links 2.4.5 (Friday, 6 January)
• RE: Bug 1649 Definition of "Programmatic Reference" (Friday, 6 January)
• RE: Bug 1649 Definition of "Programmatic Reference" (Friday, 6 January)
• Bug 1649 Definition of "Programmatic Reference" (Friday, 6 January)
• addition to definition of "delivery unit". (Thursday, 5 January)
• RE: SC 2.4.5, meaningful link text (Thursday, 5 January)
• RE: SC 2.4.5, meaningful link text (Thursday, 5 January)
• recommendation for bug #1741 SC 2.4.2 (Tuesday, 3 January)
• RE: SC 2.4.5, meaningful link text (Monday, 2 January)
• RE: SC 2.4.5, meaningful link text (Sunday, 1 January)

donaldfevans@aol.com

• Re: technique to overcome meaningful link text (Friday, 13 January)
• Re: technique to overcome meaningful link text (Friday, 13 January)
• Happy Birthday Louis Braille (Wednesday, 4 January)

Gez Lemon

• Re: normative issues to close (Wednesday, 22 March)
• Re: Baselines: how specific? (Tuesday, 14 March)
• Re: Baselines: how specific? (Tuesday, 14 March)
• Re: New failure technique for 3.2.5: automatic updates (Sunday, 12 March)
• Re: New failure technique for 3.2.5: automatic updates (Sunday, 12 March)
• Re: propose we change element to component throughout (Wednesday, 8 March)
• Re: Definition of idiom (Sunday, 5 March)
• Re: Scripting techniques for review (Wednesday, 1 February)
• Re: [action] Reasons for not moving SC 3.2.2 up to level 1 (Monday, 9 January)
• Regrets - Re: 05 January 2006 Agenda ================================== (Thursday, 5 January)
• Re: Tab panel example for SC 3.2.1 (Wednesday, 4 January)

Gregg Vanderheiden

• 1.1.1 fixes (Friday, 31 March)
• RE: 1.1 level 3 SC (Wednesday, 29 March)
• understanding guideline docs (Wednesday, 29 March)
• 1.1 level 3 SC (Wednesday, 29 March)
• survey on 1.2.2 2.3.2 and 4.1 (Tuesday, 28 March)
• 30 March 2006 Agenda ================================ (Tuesday, 28 March)
• Update on item added to last meeting. (Monday, 27 March)
• RE: Noon call - PACIFIC TIME ROOM for CSUN participants. (Thursday, 23 March)
• RE: Noon call (Thursday, 23 March)
• Ofdah. Last minute addition? (Thursday, 23 March)
• FW: Quality Assurance (QA) Questions Re: Draft of WCAG (Wednesday, 22 March)
• Slight proposed change to address a comment (Wednesday, 22 March)
• RE: normative issues to close (Wednesday, 22 March)
• 23 March 2006 Agenda ================================== (Wednesday, 22 March)
• TWO STAGES IF YOU HELP (Tuesday, 21 March)
• Issues - misc (Tuesday, 21 March)
• normative issues to close (Tuesday, 21 March)
• Draft of WCAG (Tuesday, 21 March)
• RE: Scoping clarifications - rewording? (Tuesday, 21 March)
• Scoping clarifications (Monday, 20 March)
• Edititorial change to conformance section (Monday, 20 March)
• Working group hours (Monday, 20 March)
• RE: 16 March 2006 Minutes (Friday, 17 March)
• RE: 16 March 2006 Minutes (Friday, 17 March)
• FW: EARL (Thursday, 16 March)
• 16 March 2006 Agenda =========================== (Thursday, 16 March)
• Three new techniques for 4.1.2 (Wednesday, 15 March)
• Proposal for HOW TO MEET 4.1.2 (Wednesday, 15 March)
• Revised proposal for 4.1.2 (Wednesday, 15 March)
• EARL (Wednesday, 15 March)
• FW: programmatically determined (Wednesday, 15 March)
• Please look over new 1.1.1 and its techniques. (Wednesday, 15 March)
• RE: Baselines: how specific? (Tuesday, 14 March)
• Proposal to Delete or Keep 2.4.1 (Tuesday, 14 March)
• RE: Reworking 1.1 (Monday, 13 March)
• New survey on items 1.1 and 4.1 (Monday, 13 March)
• Fixing 4.1 (Monday, 13 March)
• Reworking 1.1 (Monday, 13 March)
• Side Benefits (Monday, 13 March)
• RE: CONFORMANCE issues & resolutions -- based on new conformance section. (Monday, 13 March)
• RE: New failure technique for 3.2.5: automatic updates (Sunday, 12 March)
• Proposal rev1 - Definition of Programmatically determined (Sunday, 12 March)
• Proposal - Definition of Programmatically determined (Sunday, 12 March)
• RE: Open Issue 486 - Synchronization WCAG with ACCLIP Specifications (Saturday, 11 March)
• RE: Issues from Microsoft ISSUE #2 Testability of Audio Descriptions (Saturday, 11 March)
• RE: Open Issue 486 - Synchronization WCAG with ACCLIP Specifications (Saturday, 11 March)
• RE: New failure technique for 3.2.5: automatic updates (Saturday, 11 March)
• PLEASE NOTE THAT THE SURVEY IS DUE BY MONDAY NIGHT - (Saturday, 11 March)
• Open Issue 486 - Synchronization WCAG with ACCLIP Specifications (Friday, 10 March)
• 741 Please add Digital Rights Management and visual verification to issues list. (Friday, 10 March)
• General Issues - Proposals to close (Friday, 10 March)
• RE: Issues from Microsoft - Issue #4 (Friday, 10 March)
• RE: Realtime caption tools? (Friday, 10 March)
• RE: Issues from Microsoft (Friday, 10 March)
• RE: 09 March 2006 Minutes (complete) (Friday, 10 March)
• RE: Wording of SC 1.3.5 (Thursday, 9 March)
• RE: Introduction Issues and proposals - survey for 09 March (Wednesday, 8 March)
• RE: CONTENT (Wednesday, 8 March)
• RE: Just (almost plain) Web-page* (Wednesday, 8 March)
• oops - missed a conformance item - miscategorized. (Wednesday, 8 March)
• FW: 09 March 2006 Agenda (Wednesday, 8 March)
• Revised Conformance Section (Wednesday, 8 March)
• Just (almost plain) Web-page* (Wednesday, 8 March)
• INTRODUCTIONS - issues and proposed resolutions (Wednesday, 8 March)
• CONFORMANCE issues & resolutions -- based on new conformance section. (Wednesday, 8 March)
• propose we change element to component throughout (Wednesday, 8 March)
• 4.1 work in progress (Tuesday, 7 March)
• RE: Add at technique to 1.3.1 (Tuesday, 7 March)
• RE: Propose deleting failure for 3.2.5 (Tuesday, 7 March)
• Add at technique to 1.3.1 (Tuesday, 7 March)
• FW: Proposed wording for SC 1.3.1 (Tuesday, 7 March)
• Web Pages (including Web Applications) (Tuesday, 7 March)
• SLIGHT EDIT TO 4.2.1 (Tuesday, 7 March)
• REAL-TIME (Monday, 6 March)
• CONTENT (Monday, 6 March)
• RE: Definition of idiom 2 (Sunday, 5 March)
• Definition of idiom 2 (Sunday, 5 March)
• RE: Definition of idiom (Sunday, 5 March)
• RE: Definition of idiom (Friday, 3 March)
• Long meeting again. 3 to 6 Eastern (Wednesday, 1 March)
• 02 March 2006 Agenda =========================================== (Wednesday, 1 March)
• RE: Propose deleting failure for 3.2.5 (Wednesday, 1 March)
• proposal to change Delivery Unit to Web Page or other primary resource (Tuesday, 28 February)
• New Proposed Glossary. (Tuesday, 28 February)
• RE: Words in context (Monday, 27 February)
• RE: SC 2.4.5: links in context (Monday, 27 February)
• text docs (Monday, 27 February)
• RE: Words in context (Sunday, 26 February)
• Real-time event - Definition (Sunday, 26 February)
• Words in context (Sunday, 26 February)
• RE: perceivable structures (Sunday, 26 February)
• RE: New Caption Definition - please comment (Sunday, 26 February)
• RE: programmatically determined (Sunday, 26 February)
• RE: New Caption Definition - please comment (Sunday, 26 February)
• RE: New Caption Definition - please comment (Sunday, 26 February)
• RE: Real-time events (Sunday, 26 February)
• RE: SC 2.4.5: links in context (Sunday, 26 February)
• RE: SC 2.4.5: links in context (Sunday, 26 February)
• RE: Suggested edits for guidelines 1.4 CONTRAST (Friday, 24 February)
• RE: New Caption Definition - please comment (Friday, 24 February)
• Real-time events (Friday, 24 February)
• New Caption Definition - please comment (Thursday, 23 February)
• REMINDER - Meeting starts 1 hour early again. (Thursday, 23 February)
• RE: perceivable structures (Wednesday, 22 February)
• RE: perceivable structures (Wednesday, 22 February)
• RE: perceivable structures (Wednesday, 22 February)
• PROPOSE - DELETE link DEFINITION (Wednesday, 22 February)
• 23 February 2006 Agenda ================================ (Wednesday, 22 February)
• RE: perceivable structures (Wednesday, 22 February)
• RE: Definition of baseline (Wednesday, 22 February)
• RE: Definition of baseline (Wednesday, 22 February)
• GLOSSARY (Wednesday, 22 February)
• DROP unfamiliar content (Wednesday, 22 February)
• programmatically determined (Wednesday, 22 February)
• perceivable structures (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Definition Nesting (Wednesday, 22 February)
• link DEFINITION (Wednesday, 22 February)
• 2.3 Suggested edits for guidelines 2.3 on Seizure disorders (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Suggested edits for guidelines 1.4 CONTRAST (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Definition of baseline (Wednesday, 22 February)
• RE: feedback on Web Unit (Tuesday, 21 February)
• RE: About tests 37-41 (headers) (Monday, 20 February)
• RE: Definition of "technology": proposed modification (Wednesday, 15 February)
• RE: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units (Wednesday, 15 February)
• new sufficient technique for 2.3.1 (Wednesday, 15 February)
• 16 February 2006 Agenda ======================================== (Wednesday, 15 February)
• RE: REwrite of 1.1.6 (Tuesday, 14 February)
• RE: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units (Tuesday, 14 February)
• RE: Content Negotiation (was: Why an standalone image shall conform to WCAG 2.0?) (Monday, 13 February)
• RE: Why an standalone image shall conform to WCAG 2.0? (was Re: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units) (Monday, 13 February)
• RE: Why an standalone image shall conform to WCAG 2.0? (was Re: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units) (Monday, 13 February)
• RE: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units (Sunday, 12 February)
• RE: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units (Sunday, 12 February)
• RE: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units - Better term? (Sunday, 12 February)
• RE: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units - Better term? (Sunday, 12 February)
• RE: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units - Better term? (Saturday, 11 February)
• RE: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units (Saturday, 11 February)
• RE: REwrite of 1.1.6 (Saturday, 11 February)
• RE: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units (Friday, 10 February)
• RE: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units (Friday, 10 February)
• RE: REwrite of 1.1.6 (Friday, 10 February)
• RE: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units (Friday, 10 February)
• caption addition (Friday, 10 February)
• RE: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units (Friday, 10 February)
• RE: Longdesc (was Re: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units) (Friday, 10 February)
• RE: collated transcript technique (Friday, 10 February)
• RE: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units (Thursday, 9 February)
• RE: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units (Thursday, 9 February)
• RE: RELATED ISSUE AUTHORED UNIT (Thursday, 9 February)
• RE: 3.2.4 edit? (Thursday, 9 February)
• RE: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units (Thursday, 9 February)
• RE: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units (Thursday, 9 February)
• RE: BIG ISSUE -- TAKE 2 on WEB UNIT (Thursday, 9 February)
• RE: BIG ISSUE -- TAKE 2 on WEB UNIT - RATIONALE (Thursday, 9 February)
• RE: Longdesc (was Re: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units) (Thursday, 9 February)
• RE: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units (Thursday, 9 February)
• RE: 3.2.4 edit? (Thursday, 9 February)
• RE: RELATED ISSUE AUTHORED UNIT (Thursday, 9 February)
• REwrite of 1.1.6 (Wednesday, 8 February)
• RELATED ISSUE AUTHORED UNIT (Wednesday, 8 February)
• BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units (Wednesday, 8 February)
• 3.2.4 edit? (Wednesday, 8 February)
• 09 February 2006 Agenda ========================== (Wednesday, 8 February)
• MEETING STARTS 1 hour early again this week. (thursday) (Wednesday, 8 February)
• RE: issue 741 (Friday, 3 February)
• Note that this weeks meeting is scheduled to start one hour earlier than our previous meeting time and will run for 3 - 3.5 hrs. (Wednesday, 1 February)
• 02 February 2006 Agenda ===================================== (Wednesday, 1 February)
• RE: proposed enhanced definition for caption (Wednesday, 1 February)
• RE: regrets for next week teleconf (Saturday, 28 January)
• Next weeks meeting starting 1 hour earlier and going 3 to 3.5 hrs (Friday, 27 January)
• RE: parent child relationships in Wiki (Thursday, 26 January)
• RE: parent child relationships in Wiki (Thursday, 26 January)
• RE: parent child relationships in Wiki (Thursday, 26 January)
• RE: parent child relationships in Wiki - other questions (Thursday, 26 January)
• RE: programmatically determined and AT (Thursday, 26 January)
• RE: parent child relationships in Wiki (Thursday, 26 January)
• RE: programmatically determined and AT (Wednesday, 25 January)
• RE: Need to have a "technology independent" heading in the GL (Wednesday, 25 January)
• 2.3 Issue Cleanup - Revisited (Wednesday, 25 January)
• RE: Need to have a "technology independent" heading in the GL (Wednesday, 25 January)
• 26 January 2006 Agenda ======================================== (Wednesday, 25 January)
• 2.3 Issue Cleanup (Wednesday, 25 January)
• Clearing Issues for 1.4 (Wednesday, 25 January)
• RE: 1.2 issue (Tuesday, 24 January)
• FW: 1.2 issue (Tuesday, 24 January)
• RE: SMIL experts (Monday, 23 January)
• SMIL experts (Sunday, 22 January)
• RE: SMIL TECHNIQUE (Sunday, 22 January)
• SMIL TECHNIQUE (Saturday, 21 January)
• Tehcnique for 1.1.1 Using the body of the applet element (Saturday, 21 January)
• New bullet for 2.2.1 to account for session timeouts (Saturday, 21 January)
• RE: Link to UW (Friday, 20 January)
• 17 January 2006 Agenda ======================================= (Thursday, 19 January)
• RE: Techniques Task Force Meeting (Thursday, 19 January)
• Techniques Task Force Meeting (Wednesday, 18 January)
• RE: Proposal for Drafting committee (Wednesday, 18 January)
• RE: Technology-specific techniques (Tuesday, 17 January)
• RE: Next meetings? (Monday, 16 January)
• RE: a serouse issue at hand was: Re: [action] Reasons for not moving SC 3.2.2 up to level 1 (Thursday, 12 January)
• Proposal for Drafting committee (Thursday, 12 January)
• RE: programatically determineds (Thursday, 12 January)
• RE: [action] Reasons for not moving SC 3.2.2 up to level 1 (Thursday, 12 January)
• RE: Technique boilerplate (Wednesday, 11 January)
• RE: 12 January 2006 Agenda ======================================= (Wednesday, 11 January)
• 12 January 2006 Agenda ======================================= (Wednesday, 11 January)
• RE: Technique boilerplate (Wednesday, 11 January)
• RE: SC 2.4.5, meaningful link text (Thursday, 5 January)
• FW: proposal for removing guideline 3 (and working on it after last call as an extension) (Wednesday, 4 January)
• 05 January 2006 Agenda ================================== (Wednesday, 4 January)
• RE: Tab panel example for SC 3.2.1 (Wednesday, 4 January)
• RE: Tab panel example for SC 3.2.1 (Wednesday, 4 January)
• Issues and recommendations - BATCH 1 (Wednesday, 4 January)
• RE: Tab panel example for SC 3.2.1 (Wednesday, 4 January)
• RE: Example for SC 3.2.2 (Wednesday, 4 January)
• RE: Instructions and team assignments for getting to Last Call (Wednesday, 4 January)
• RE: SC 2.4.5, meaningful link text (Monday, 2 January)
• RE: SC 2.4.5, meaningful link text (Monday, 2 January)
• RE: SC 2.4.5, meaningful link text (Sunday, 1 January)

Jason White

• Re: 4.1 work in progress (Wednesday, 8 March)
• Re: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units (Wednesday, 15 February)
• Re: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units - Better term? (Sunday, 12 February)
• Re: BIG ISSUE -- TAKE 2 on WEB UNIT (Friday, 10 February)
• Longdesc (was Re: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units) (Thursday, 9 February)
• Re: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units (Thursday, 9 February)
• Re: SC 2.4.5, meaningful link text (Tuesday, 3 January)

Jim Allan

• Joint WAI Working group Teleconference for 9 February 2006 (Thursday, 2 February)

Jim Ley

• Re: Web authoring statistics by Google (Saturday, 28 January)

Jim Thatcher

• RE: About tests 37-41 (headers) (Sunday, 26 February)
• RE: About tests 37-41 (headers) (Tuesday, 21 February)
• RE: About tests 37-41 (headers) (Tuesday, 21 February)

Johannes Koch

• Re: About tests 37-41 (headers) (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: Why an standalone image shall conform to WCAG 2.0? (was Re: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units) (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: Content Negotiation (was: Why an standalone image shall conform to WCAG 2.0?) (Monday, 13 February)
• Content Negotiation (was: Why an standalone image shall conform to WCAG 2.0?) (Monday, 13 February)
• Re: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units - Better term? (Saturday, 11 February)
• Re: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units (Friday, 10 February)
• Re: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units (Friday, 10 February)
• Re: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units (Thursday, 9 February)
• Re: [Bugzilla WCAG Issue 1680] alt text for linked images (1) (Saturday, 21 January)
• Re: technique to overcome meaningful link text (Friday, 13 January)

John M Slatin

• RE: understanding guideline docs (Thursday, 30 March)
• RE: 1.1 level 3 SC (Wednesday, 29 March)
• RE: Slight proposed change to address a comment (Wednesday, 22 March)
• RE: Issues - misc (Tuesday, 21 March)
• RE: Scoping clarifications - rewording? (Tuesday, 21 March)
• RE: SC 2.4.5: Good news about AT support (Sunday, 19 March)
• SC 2.4.5: Good news about AT support (Saturday, 18 March)
• RE: 16 March 2006 Minutes (Friday, 17 March)
• RE: 16 March 2006 Minutes (Friday, 17 March)
• RE: Proposal to Delete or Keep 2.4.1 (Wednesday, 15 March)
• RE: Proposal to Delete or Keep 2.4.1 (Tuesday, 14 March)
• RE: Baselines: how specific? (Tuesday, 14 March)
• RE: Reworking 1.1 (Monday, 13 March)
• RE: Open Issue 486 - Synchronization WCAG with ACCLIP Specifications (Saturday, 11 March)
• RE: Open Issue 486 - Synchronization WCAG with ACCLIP Specifications (Saturday, 11 March)
• Re: Revised Conformance Section (Thursday, 9 March)
• RE: CONTENT (Wednesday, 8 March)
• RE: Is using frames to group links a sufficient technique for 2.4.3? (Wednesday, 8 March)
• RE: Definition of idiom 2 (Sunday, 5 March)
• RE: Definition of idiom (Friday, 3 March)
• RE: Definition of idiom (Friday, 3 March)
• Definition of idiom (Friday, 3 March)
• RE: Propose deleting failure for 3.2.5 (Wednesday, 1 March)
• RE: Propose deleting failure for 3.2.5 (Wednesday, 1 March)
• RE: Words in context (Monday, 27 February)
• RE: SC 2.4.5: links in context (Monday, 27 February)
• RE: Real-time events (Sunday, 26 February)
• RE: Words in context (Sunday, 26 February)
• RE: Real-time events (Friday, 24 February)
• RE: SC 2.4.5: links in context (Friday, 24 February)
• RE: SC 2.4.5: links in context (Friday, 24 February)
• SC 2.4.5: links in context (Friday, 24 February)
• RE: REwrite of 1.1.6 (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Definition of "technology": proposed modification (Monday, 13 February)
• RE: Joint WAI Working group Teleconference for 9 February 2006 (Thursday, 9 February)
• RE: Action item: resources on sign language video (Monday, 30 January)
• Action item: resources on sign language video (Sunday, 29 January)
• Tentativedates for next WCAG WG face to face (Tuesday, 17 January)
• RE: technique to overcome meaningful link text (Friday, 13 January)
• RE: technique to overcome meaningful link text (Friday, 13 January)
• RE: programatically determineds (Friday, 6 January)
• RE: SC 2.4.5, meaningful link text (Thursday, 5 January)

Judy Brewer

• Re: 23 March 2006 Minutes (Friday, 24 March)
• Partial Regrets -- Re: 02 March 2006 Agenda (Thursday, 2 March)
• Preview - Candidate Recommendation considerations (Thursday, 23 February)
• FYI: Approaching deadlines for Comments on European Activities Related to Web Accessibility (Friday, 17 February)

Katie Haritos-Shea

• Re: 16 February 2006 Agenda ======================================== (Wednesday, 15 February)
• Link to UW (Thursday, 19 January)
• Link to UW (Thursday, 19 January)
• Do we need to think about Ink ML in relation to Images or Otherwise for WCAG 2? (Thursday, 19 January)

Kelly Ford

• RE: SC 2.4.5: Good news about AT support (Saturday, 18 March)

Kerstin Goldsmith

• Re: Definition of baseline (Wednesday, 22 February)
• feedback on Web Unit (Tuesday, 21 February)
• Re: 3.2.4 edit? (Wednesday, 8 February)
• Re: MEETING STARTS 1 hour early again this week. (thursday) (Wednesday, 8 February)
• Re: Partial regrets RE: 02 February 2006 Agenda ===================================== (Thursday, 2 February)
• issue 741 (Thursday, 2 February)
• Re: Techniques Task Force Meeting (Thursday, 19 January)
• late regrets for TH call (Sunday, 15 January)
• programatically determineds (Friday, 6 January)

Lisa Seeman

• iframes technique for script based web applications (Tuesday, 14 February)
• Re: Proposal for Drafting committee (Wednesday, 18 January)
• Next meetings? (Monday, 16 January)
• Re: a serouse issue at hand was: Re: [action] Reasons for not moving SC 3.2.2 up to level 1 (Sunday, 15 January)
• a serouse issue at hand was: Re: [action] Reasons for not moving SC 3.2.2 up to level 1 (Thursday, 12 January)
• Re: [action] Reasons for not moving SC 3.2.2 up to level 1 (Thursday, 12 January)
• Re: programatically determineds (Thursday, 12 January)
• proposal for removing guideline 3 (and working on it after last call as an extension) (Tuesday, 3 January)

Loretta Guarino Reid

• RE: 1.1 level 3 SC (Wednesday, 29 March)
• Team B Survey (Tuesday, 28 March)
• Two more surveys (Tuesday, 21 March)
• New How To Meet and techniques for SC 2.4.5 (Tuesday, 21 March)
• RE: Survey - Team A Techniques for March 16 (Thursday, 16 March)
• RE: Proposal to Delete or Keep 2.4.1 (Wednesday, 15 March)
• RE: Proposal to Delete or Keep 2.4.1 (Wednesday, 15 March)
• One more survey! (Wednesday, 15 March)
• Re: Proposal to Delete or Keep 2.4.1 (Tuesday, 14 March)
• Two more March 13 surveys (Sunday, 12 March)
• FW: Realtime caption tools? (Friday, 10 March)
• Wording of SC 1.3.5 (Thursday, 9 March)
• Team B Survey for March 9 (Wednesday, 8 March)
• New (proposed) SC 3.1.6 A mechanism is available for finding specific pronunciation of words where meaning cannot be determined without pronunciation. (Tuesday, 7 March)
• Proposed wording for SC 1.3.1 (Tuesday, 7 March)
• Questionaire available from Team B (Tuesday, 28 February)
• RE: perceivable structures (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Team B Surveys (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: perceivable structures (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: About tests 37-41 (headers) (Monday, 20 February)
• Survey for 1.3 and 2.4 (Wednesday, 15 February)
• Re: REwrite of 1.1.6 (Saturday, 11 February)
• one more survey (sorry for the late notice) (Thursday, 9 February)
• Surveys for GL 1.3, 2.4 (Wednesday, 8 February)
• proposed enhanced definition for caption (Tuesday, 31 January)
• Action Item: caption failure (Tuesday, 31 January)
• Re: parent child relationships in Wiki (Thursday, 26 January)
• Re: Need to have a "technology independent" heading in the GL (Wednesday, 25 January)
• Survey of techniques for SC 1.3.1 (Tuesday, 24 January)
• Technology-specific techniques (Monday, 16 January)
• Re: technique to overcome meaningful link text (Friday, 13 January)
• RE: 12 January 2006 Agenda ======================================= (Wednesday, 11 January)
• GL 1.3 Survey for tomorrow's teleconference available (Wednesday, 11 January)
• Technique boilerplate (Wednesday, 11 January)
• One more survey! (Thursday, 5 January)
• GL 1.3 survey available (Wednesday, 4 January)

Luca Mascaro

• Re: R: 30 March 2006 Agenda ================================ (Friday, 31 March)
• Re: Regrets: 23 March 2006 Agenda ================================== (Friday, 24 March)
• Re: 23 February 2006 Agenda ================================ (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: 16 February 2006 Agenda ======================================== (Thursday, 16 February)
• regrets for next week teleconf (Saturday, 28 January)
• Re: Tehcnique for 1.1.1 Using the body of the applet element (Saturday, 21 January)
• Re: Regrets: 17 January 2006 Agenda ======================================= (Friday, 20 January)

Makoto UEKI - Infoaxia, Inc. -

• Re: Noon call - PACIFIC TIME ROOM for CSUN participants. - Late regrets (Friday, 24 March)
• Re: 16 March 2006 Agenda - late regrets (Friday, 17 March)
• Re: New Caption Definition - please comment (Sunday, 26 February)
• Re: SC 2.4.5: links in context (Saturday, 25 February)
• Re: SC 2.4.5: links in context (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Suggested edits for guidelines 1.4 CONTRAST (Friday, 24 February)
• Late regrets: 23 February 2006 Agenda ================================ (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Regrets: 02 February 2006 Agenda ===================================== (Friday, 3 February)

Marco Bertoni

• Regrets - Re: 16 February 2006 Agenda ======================================== (Thursday, 16 February)

Michael Cooper

• Team C survey for 23 March 2006 (Tuesday, 21 March)
• RE: Proposal to Delete or Keep 2.4.1 (Wednesday, 15 March)
• RE: Introduction Issues and proposals - survey for 09 March (Wednesday, 8 March)
• RE: Propose deleting failure for 3.2.5 (Wednesday, 8 March)
• Partial regrets RE: 09 March 2006 Agenda (Wednesday, 8 March)
• RE: Just (almost plain) Web-page* (Wednesday, 8 March)
• RE: 4.1 work in progress (Wednesday, 8 March)
• RE: Is using frames to group links a sufficient technique for 2.4.3? (Wednesday, 8 March)
• RE: Propose deleting failure for 3.2.5 (Wednesday, 8 March)
• Survey from Team C (Tuesday, 7 March)
• RE: Propose deleting failure for 3.2.5 (Wednesday, 1 March)
• Questionnaire available from Team C (Tuesday, 28 February)
• Questionnaire for 2.2 techniques (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Survey for 2.1 and 2.2 (Wednesday, 15 February)
• RE: technique to overcome meaningful link text (Friday, 13 January)
• RE: Session timeouts not part of 2.2.1? (Thursday, 12 January)
• Session timeouts not part of 2.2.1? (Wednesday, 11 January)
• RE: SC 2.4.5, meaningful link text (Thursday, 5 January)

Paul Walsh, Segala

• RE: 16 March 2006 Minutes (Monday, 20 March)
• RE: 16 March 2006 Minutes (Friday, 17 March)
• RE: 16 March 2006 Minutes (Friday, 17 March)
• RE: 16 March 2006 Minutes (Friday, 17 March)
• RE: 16 March 2006 Minutes (Friday, 17 March)
• RE: CONFORMANCE issues & resolutions -- based on new conformance section. (Tuesday, 14 March)
• RE: CONFORMANCE issues & resolutions -- based on new conformance section. (Tuesday, 14 March)
• RE: CONFORMANCE issues & resolutions -- based on new conformance section. (Sunday, 12 March)
• RE: CONFORMANCE issues & resolutions -- based on new conformance section. (Saturday, 11 March)
• RE: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units (Friday, 10 February)

Roberto Castaldo

• R: 30 March 2006 Agenda ================================ (Friday, 31 March)
• Regrets: 23 March 2006 Agenda ================================== (Thursday, 23 March)
• R: 16 March 2006 Agenda =========================== (Friday, 17 March)
• Late regrets: 09 March 2006 Agenda (Friday, 10 March)
• Regrets: 02 March 2006 Agenda =========================================== (Thursday, 2 March)
• Regrets: 23 February 2006 Agenda ================================ (Thursday, 23 February)
• Regrets: 16 February 2006 Agenda ======================================== (Thursday, 16 February)
• Regrets: 09 February 2006 Agenda ========================== (Thursday, 9 February)
• Regrets: 02 February 2006 Agenda ===================================== (Thursday, 2 February)
• Regrets: 26 January 2006 Agenda ======================================== (Thursday, 26 January)
• Regrets: 17 January 2006 Agenda ======================================= (Thursday, 19 January)
• Regrets: 12 January 2006 Agenda ======================================= (Thursday, 12 January)

Roberto Ellero

• regrets: 30 March 2006 Agenda (Thursday, 30 March)
• Regrets: 09 March 2006 Agenda (Thursday, 9 March)
• regrets: 23 February 2006 Agenda (Thursday, 23 February)
• Re: 17 January 2006 Agenda (Friday, 20 January)
• Regrets: 05 January 2006 Agenda (Thursday, 5 January)

Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)

• RE: CONFORMANCE issues & resolutions -- based on new conformance section. (Sunday, 12 March)
• RE: Open Issue 486 - Synchronization WCAG with ACCLIP Specifications (Saturday, 11 March)
• Re: New Caption Definition - please comment (Monday, 27 February)
• RE: New Caption Definition - please comment (Friday, 24 February)
• RE: perceivable structures (Thursday, 23 February)
• RE: perceivable structures (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Regrets: 09 February 2006 Agenda ========================== (Thursday, 9 February)
• RE: Action item: resources on sign language video (Monday, 30 January)
• RE: regrets for next week teleconf (Sunday, 29 January)
• Regrets: 26 January 2006 Agenda ======================================== (Thursday, 26 January)
• RE: Tehcnique for 1.1.1 Using the body of the applet element (Saturday, 21 January)
• Regrets: 17 January 2006 Agenda ======================================= (Thursday, 19 January)
• RE: Next meetings? (Monday, 16 January)
• Re: technique to overcome meaningful link text (Friday, 13 January)
• Re: technique to overcome meaningful link text (Friday, 13 January)
• Regrets: 12 January 2006 Agenda ======================================= (Thursday, 12 January)
• Regrets - Re: 05 January 2006 Agenda ================================== (Thursday, 5 January)

Roberto Scano - IWA/HWG

• RE: understanding guideline docs (Thursday, 30 March)
• Regrets: 09 March 2006 Agenda (Thursday, 9 March)
• RE: Real-time events (Friday, 24 February)
• RE: New Caption Definition - please comment (Friday, 24 February)
• RE: Action item: resources on sign language video (Monday, 30 January)
• RE: SMIL TECHNIQUE (Sunday, 22 January)
• RE: SMIL TECHNIQUE (Sunday, 22 January)

Sailesh Panchang

• RE: About tests 37-41 (headers) (Wednesday, 22 February)

Sebastiano Nutarelli (IWA/HWG)

• Re: Regrets: 23 March 2006 Agenda ================================== (Friday, 24 March)
• Re: 16 March 2006 Agenda =========================== (Thursday, 16 March)
• Late Regrets: 02 March 2006 Agenda =========================================== (Friday, 3 March)
• Late regrets: 23 February 2006 Agenda ================================ (Friday, 24 February)
• Re: Regrets - Re: 16 February 2006 Agenda ======================================== (Friday, 17 February)
• Re: 09 February 2006 Agenda ========================== (Wednesday, 8 February)
• Re: Regrets: 02 February 2006 Agenda ===================================== (Friday, 3 February)
• Re: 26 January 2006 Agenda ======================================== (Thursday, 26 January)
• Re: 17 January 2006 Agenda ======================================= (Thursday, 19 January)
• RE: 12 January 2006 Agenda ======================================= (Thursday, 12 January)
• Regrets (Thursday, 5 January)

Shadi Abou-Zahra

• Re: 23 March 2006 Minutes (Friday, 24 March)
• Re: CONFORMANCE issues & resolutions -- based on new conformance section. (Tuesday, 14 March)
• Re: CONFORMANCE issues & resolutions -- based on new conformance section. (Tuesday, 14 March)

Sofia.Celic@nils.org.au

• Re: Scripting techniques for review (Wednesday, 8 February)
• RE: Tab panel example for SC 3.2.1 (Sunday, 8 January)
• Re: proposal for removing guideline 3 (and working on it after last call as an extension) (Friday, 6 January)
• RE: Tab panel example for SC 3.2.1 (Friday, 6 January)
• RE: Tab panel example for SC 3.2.1 (Thursday, 5 January)

Sorcha Moore

• regrets (Thursday, 9 March)
• Regrets, 02 March 2006 Agenda (Thursday, 2 March)

sorcha@segala.com

• Re: 26 January 2006 Agenda ======================================== (Thursday, 26 January)

Tim Boland

• Re: 23 March 2006 Agenda ================================== (Thursday, 23 March)
• Quality Assurance (QA) Questions Re: Draft of WCAG (Tuesday, 21 March)
• RE: Baselines: how specific? (Tuesday, 14 March)
• Regrets for March 2 WCAG WG meeting plus questions (Friday, 24 February)
• RE: perceivable structures (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: perceivable structures (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: programmatically determined (Wednesday, 22 February)
• Re: Definition of "technology": proposed modification (Wednesday, 15 February)
• RE: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units (Tuesday, 14 February)
• regrets for 9 February 2006 WCAG WG teleconference (Monday, 6 February)
• Re: proposed enhanced definition for caption (Tuesday, 31 January)
• WCAG-DI consistency of "perceivable unit" and "user agent" definitions? (Tuesday, 24 January)
• RE: Instructions and team assignments for getting to Last Call (Tuesday, 3 January)

Vicente Luque Centeno

• RE: About tests 37-41 (headers) (Sunday, 26 February)
• RE: About tests 37-41 (headers) (Sunday, 26 February)
• About tests 37-41 (headers) (Monday, 20 February)

WATANABE Takayuki

• Regrets (Thursday, 5 January)

Wendy Chisholm

• Re: Fw: Real show (Tuesday, 17 January)

Yvette Hoitink

• RE: survey on 1.2.2 2.3.2 and 4.1 (Wednesday, 29 March)
• Regrets (RE: 09 March 2006 Agenda) (Thursday, 9 March)
• Partial regrets for 2 March 2006 (Friday, 3 March)
• RE: New Caption Definition - please comment (Tuesday, 28 February)
• RE: Real-time events (Friday, 24 February)
• RE: New Caption Definition - please comment (Friday, 24 February)
• RE: Why an standalone image shall conform to WCAG 2.0? (was Re: BIG ISSUE -- re Delivery Units) (Monday, 13 February)
• Web authoring statistics by Google (Saturday, 28 January)
• Regrets - no message (Was: RE: 17 January 2006 Agenda =======================================) (Thursday, 19 January)

Last message date: Friday, 31 March 2006 11:57:31 UTC