- From: Tim Boland <frederick.boland@nist.gov>
- Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 11:36:08 -0500
- To: "Gregg Vanderheiden" <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
- Message-Id: <5.1.1.5.2.20060222113348.01ced058@mailserver.nist.gov>
For "perceive" - How about "to become aware of directly through the senses", "to take notice of", or "to achieve understanding of"? Thanks and best wishes Tim Boland NIST At 09:35 AM 2/22/2006 -0600, you wrote: >Well, > > > >We could use another word for perceive but we decided that we wanted to >stick with perceive because is was sensory agnostic. Still you make a >good point Tim. > > > >Hmmmm. Got another word for perceive or a short definition of it we can >plug in? > > > > >Gregg > > -- ------------------------------ >Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. >Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. >Director - Trace R & D Center >University of Wisconsin-Madison >The Player for my DSS sound file is at ><http://tinyurl.com/dho6b>http://tinyurl.com/dho6b<http://tinyurl.com/cmfd9> > > > >---------- >From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On >Behalf Of Tim Boland >Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 9:16 AM >To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org >Subject: Re: perceivable structures >The proposed definition seems somewhat "circular" to me - "perceivable" >defined in terms of "perceived" >Maybe change proposed definition to: > >"relationships in the content that are (objectively?) noticeable (through >the user's senses) from the default presentation"? > >Thanks and best wishes >Tim Boland NIST > > At 02:28 AM 2/22/2006 -0600, you wrote: > > > >This definition seems backward. > >perceivable structures > >relationships in the content that are necessary to perceive the >organization of the content. > > >I think it needs to be > > >perceivable structures > >relationships in the content that can be perceived from the default >presentation. > > > >RATIONALE > >What we are trying to achieve is to make sure that any relationships that >are obvious from the presentation are also obvious when looking at the >markup. > >Yes? > > > >Gregg > >------------------------ >Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. >Professor - Depts of Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. >Director - Trace R & D Center >University of Wisconsin-Madison ><<http://trace.wisc.edu/>http://trace.wisc.edu/> FAX 608/262-8848 >For a list of our list discussions ><http://trace.wisc.edu/lists/>http://trace.wisc.edu/lists/ >The Player for my DSS sound file is at ><http://tinyurl.com/dho6b>http://tinyurl.com/dho6b ><http://trace.wisc.edu:8080/mailman/listinfo/> > > >
Received on Wednesday, 22 February 2006 16:37:34 UTC