- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 02:03:52 -0600
- To: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <002701c63786$85397b40$ee8cfea9@NC6000BAK>
Our definition of LINK is more than a definition. It also includes judgments as to what the SC means. Can we think of a way to qualify this so we don't have to say this in the definition? Maybe use "User Links" or "hyperlink" or something Here is what we have link hyperlink between the current document and a single destination. NOTE: "Link" refers to a single "arc" in the XML Linking Language (XLink) Version 1.0 specification.) Only links that are available to be activated by the user need to meet accessibility requirements. This excludes links that are activated automatically or programmatically. Gregg ------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Depts of Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. Director - Trace R & D Center University of Wisconsin-Madison < <http://trace.wisc.edu/> http://trace.wisc.edu/> FAX 608/262-8848 For a list of our list discussions http://trace.wisc.edu/lists/ The Player for my DSS sound file is at http://tinyurl.com/dho6b <http://trace.wisc.edu:8080/mailman/listinfo/>
Received on Wednesday, 22 February 2006 08:04:05 UTC