RE: 1.1 level 3 SC

I agree with Loretta that we should keep 1.1.2 but change it to "full
corrected screenplay."
 
John
 

"Good design is accessible design." 
John Slatin, Ph.D.
Director, Accessibility Institute
University of Texas at Austin
FAC 248C
1 University Station G9600
Austin, TX 78712
ph 512-495-4288, f 512-495-4524
email jslatin@mail.utexas.edu
web http://www.utexas.edu/research/accessibility/
<http://www.utexas.edu/research/accessibility/> 


 

 


________________________________

	From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org
[mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Loretta Guarino Reid
	Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2006 12:10 am
	To: Gregg Vanderheiden; w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
	Subject: RE: 1.1 level 3 SC
	
	
	I think we still want the level 3 success criterion (in case
level 1 was satisfied by providing audio description). But we should use
the same 'screenplay'.
	 

	Loretta Guarino Reid 
	lguarino@adobe.com 
	Adobe Systems, Acrobat Engineering 

	 


________________________________

		From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org
[mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Gregg Vanderheiden
		Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 9:56 PM
		To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
		Subject: 1.1 level 3 SC
		
		

		I was thinking - since we have a strong text equivalent
option for multimedia at 1.2 L1 - do we really want a weak one at level
3 of 1.1?  

		 

		Or do we want to use the same 'screenplay' at L3 as at
L1 ? 

		 

		Makes it harder for L3 but L3 items are optional.    And
only a screenplay would really give the full information to someone who
was deafblind. 

		 

		Thoughts? 

		 

		
		Gregg
		
		------------------------

		Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. 
		Professor - Depts of Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr.
		Director - Trace R & D Center 
		University of Wisconsin-Madison 
		<http://trace.wisc.edu/ <http://trace.wisc.edu/> > FAX
608/262-8848  
		For a list of our list discussions
http://trace.wisc.edu/lists/

		The Player for my DSS sound file is at
http://tinyurl.com/dho6b 

		  <http://trace.wisc.edu:8080/mailman/listinfo/>