- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Wed, 22 Feb 2006 14:51:01 -0600
- To: "'Tim Boland'" <frederick.boland@nist.gov>
- Cc: <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <019201c637f1$b0a22460$ee8cfea9@NC6000BAK>
Hmmm Looking for a single word or a couple so we can use it in place of perceive. First one fits but is pretty long The other two mean something different than perceive. Understanding is beyond perception for example. It is a tough one. Gregg -- ------------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. Director - Trace R & D Center University of Wisconsin-Madison The Player for my DSS sound file is at http://tinyurl.com/dho6b <http://tinyurl.com/cmfd9> _____ From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Tim Boland Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 10:36 AM To: Gregg Vanderheiden Cc: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org Subject: RE: perceivable structures For "perceive" - How about "to become aware of directly through the senses", "to take notice of", or "to achieve understanding of"? Thanks and best wishes Tim Boland NIST At 09:35 AM 2/22/2006 -0600, you wrote: Well, We could use another word for perceive but we decided that we wanted to stick with perceive because is was sensory agnostic. Still you make a good point Tim. Hmmmm. Got another word for perceive or a short definition of it we can plug in? Gregg -- ------------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. Director - Trace R & D Center University of Wisconsin-Madison The Player for my DSS sound file is at http://tinyurl.com/dho6b <http://tinyurl.com/cmfd9> _____ From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Tim Boland Sent: Wednesday, February 22, 2006 9:16 AM To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org Subject: Re: perceivable structures The proposed definition seems somewhat "circular" to me - "perceivable" defined in terms of "perceived" Maybe change proposed definition to: "relationships in the content that are (objectively?) noticeable (through the user's senses) from the default presentation"? Thanks and best wishes Tim Boland NIST At 02:28 AM 2/22/2006 -0600, you wrote: This definition seems backward. perceivable structures relationships in the content that are necessary to perceive the organization of the content. I think it needs to be perceivable structures relationships in the content that can be perceived from the default presentation. RATIONALE What we are trying to achieve is to make sure that any relationships that are obvious from the presentation are also obvious when looking at the markup. Yes? Gregg ------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Depts of Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. Director - Trace R & D Center University of Wisconsin-Madison <http://trace.wisc.edu/> FAX 608/262-8848 For a list of our list discussions http://trace.wisc.edu/lists/ The Player for my DSS sound file is at http://tinyurl.com/dho6b <http://trace.wisc.edu:8080/mailman/listinfo/>
Received on Wednesday, 22 February 2006 20:51:06 UTC