- From: Gez Lemon <gez.lemon@gmail.com>
- Date: Wed, 22 Mar 2006 08:36:05 +0000
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
On 22/03/06, Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu> wrote: <quote> Perhaps we should just say Level 1 success criteria: 1. Achieve a minimum level of accessibility 2. Can reasonably be applied to all Web resources. Level 2 success criteria: 1. Achieve an enhanced level of accessibility 2. Can reasonably be applied to all Web resources. Level 3 success criteria: 1. Achieve additional accessibility enhancements for people with disabilities. 2. Are not necessarily applicable to all Web resources. </quote> I've had difficulty trying to understand the difference between a priority and a level. I like the simplicity of this proposal, but to me, it doesn't differ in important ways from WCAG 1.0. The levels infer a level of importance, reinforced with "minimum", "enhanced", and "additional". The only difference I can see is that level 3 takes into account that the success criteria might not be applicable to all technologies. Best regards, Gez -- _____________________________ Supplement your vitamins http://juicystudio.com
Received on Wednesday, 22 March 2006 08:36:12 UTC