RE: Need to have a "technology independent" heading in the GL

 

We have headings for HTML and CSS techniques in both the sufficient and
optional sections. Why not have "Technology Independent Techniques" headings
in both the sufficient and optional sections? I think clarity is more
important than duplicate duplications.

 

Cheers

David MacDonald

 

.Access empowers people
            .barriers disable them.

www.eramp.com

  _____  

From: Gregg Vanderheiden [mailto:gv@trace.wisc.edu] 
Sent: Wednesday, January 25, 2006 12:35 PM
To: 'David MacDonald'; w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Subject: RE: Need to have a "technology independent" heading in the GL

 

 

The tech indep show up in two places.

 

Either - in a sufficiency statement 

Or - in an advisory area.

 

 

We used to have the sufficient ones listed just after the sufficiency
section but it seemed so redundant that we removed it. 

 

Anything that is a link in the sufficient section is a tech indep technique.


 

Having a section for them seemed to make sense but . can't figure out how to
do it without having duplication repetitively in a duplicative fashion.  

 


Gregg

 -- ------------------------------ 
Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. 
Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr.
Director - Trace R & D Center 
University of Wisconsin-Madison 

 

 


  _____  


From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf
Of David MacDonald
Sent: Tuesday, January 24, 2006 4:23 PM
To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Subject: Need to have a "technology independent" heading in the GL

In the "How to meet." Document, I think we need to have a "Technology
Independent" heading in the techniques. I don't think it is clear if we just
have some general techniques with no heading followed by a heading that says
"Technology-Specific".

 

Regards

David MacDonald

 

.Access empowers people
            .barriers disable them.

www.eramp.com