RE: CONFORMANCE issues & resolutions -- based on new conformance section.

Hi Folks.

Are there minutes from last Thursday's meeting? I didn't see any posted.

David MacDonald
www.eramp.com 


-----Original Message-----
From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf
Of Roberto Scano (IWA/HWG)
Sent: Sunday, March 12, 2006 4:01 AM
To: paulwalsh@segala.com; gv@trace.wisc.edu; w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Subject: RE: CONFORMANCE issues & resolutions -- based on new conformance
section. 


I totally agree!

----- Messaggio originale -----
    Da: "Paul Walsh, Segala"<paulwalsh@segala.com>
    Inviato: 11/03/06 23.12.22
    A: "'Gregg Vanderheiden'"<gv@trace.wisc.edu>,
"w3c-wai-gl@w3.org"<w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
    Oggetto: RE: CONFORMANCE  issues & resolutions -- based on new
conformance section. 
    
     <http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=1786> 
    
     <http://trace.wisc.edu/bugzilla_wcag/show_bug.cgi?id=1786> 
    
     
     1786 Suggest using EARL for conformance claims 
    
    conformance section should refer to the possibility of using EARL to
    provide machine-readable conformance claims.
     
    [PW] Perhaps the group would consider using the output of the W3C's
first
    incubator activity for conformance claims?
    That is, the Web Content Label (WCL) [1]. The Mobile Web Initiative
(MWI)
    mobileOK Trustmark
    will come in the form of a Content Label, with no visual icons to
represent
    conformance. 
     
    It makes sense to me to use EARL for recording test descriptions, test
cases
    etc. and a Content Label
    to make conformance claims. Content Labelling is becoming increasingly
    popular by many
    associations that have their own code of conduct, so there are numerous
real
    use cases within the industry already. 
     
    I'm interested to hear the groups thoughts on this one - I know Shadi
might
    have a different opinion :)
     
    Cheers
    Paul
    Segala 
    
    

[Messaggio troncato. Toccare Modifica->Segna per il download per recuperare
la restante parte.]

Received on Sunday, 12 March 2006 23:14:24 UTC