- From: Gregg Vanderheiden <gv@trace.wisc.edu>
- Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2006 00:15:57 -0600
- To: "'Loretta Guarino Reid'" <lguarino@adobe.com>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <036b01c61676$7e526980$ee8cfea9@NC6000BAK>
Agree that we need to reword. But it has to be any of the "combinations" not any of the "techniques" if there are combinations. But not all are combinations.. Hmmmmmm How about: Any of the following options (bullets) is deemed to be sufficient by the WCAG Working Group to meet success criterion XXX. If Multiple Situations are listed then choose an option from the situation that applies to the content being designed or evaluated. Gregg -- ------------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. Director - Trace R & D Center University of Wisconsin-Madison _____ From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Loretta Guarino Reid Sent: Tuesday, January 10, 2006 6:59 PM To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org Subject: Technique boilerplate The boilerplate for many of our How to Meet Technique sessions says something like: "The following combinations of techniques are deemed to be sufficient by the WCAG Working Group for meeting success criterion XXX." I find this wording confusing, since I'm never sure it means that you must use all of the techniques, or whether using any one will do. Can I propose that we change this text to one of the following, as appropriate for the SC:" <proposal1> Any of the following techniques is deemed to be sufficient by the WCAG Working Group for meeting success criterion XXX." </proposal1> <proposal2> Applying all of the following techniques is deemed to be sufficient by the WCAG Working Group for meeting success criterion XXX." </proposal2> Loretta Guarino Reid lguarino@adobe.com Adobe Systems, Acrobat Engineering
Received on Wednesday, 11 January 2006 06:16:05 UTC