- From: Loretta Guarino Reid <lguarino@adobe.com>
- Date: Tue, 28 Mar 2006 22:10:10 -0800
- To: "Gregg Vanderheiden" <gv@trace.wisc.edu>, <w3c-wai-gl@w3.org>
- Message-ID: <0DAF2B31FBCEB6439F63FA7F91601F74A5BF8A@namail3.corp.adobe.com>
I think we still want the level 3 success criterion (in case level 1 was satisfied by providing audio description). But we should use the same 'screenplay'. Loretta Guarino Reid lguarino@adobe.com Adobe Systems, Acrobat Engineering ________________________________ From: w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-wai-gl-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Gregg Vanderheiden Sent: Tuesday, March 28, 2006 9:56 PM To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org Subject: 1.1 level 3 SC I was thinking - since we have a strong text equivalent option for multimedia at 1.2 L1 - do we really want a weak one at level 3 of 1.1? Or do we want to use the same 'screenplay' at L3 as at L1 ? Makes it harder for L3 but L3 items are optional. And only a screenplay would really give the full information to someone who was deafblind. Thoughts? Gregg ------------------------ Gregg C Vanderheiden Ph.D. Professor - Depts of Ind. Engr. & BioMed Engr. Director - Trace R & D Center University of Wisconsin-Madison <http://trace.wisc.edu/ <http://trace.wisc.edu/> > FAX 608/262-8848 For a list of our list discussions http://trace.wisc.edu/lists/ The Player for my DSS sound file is at http://tinyurl.com/dho6b <http://trace.wisc.edu:8080/mailman/listinfo/>
Received on Wednesday, 29 March 2006 06:11:11 UTC