- From: Johannes Koch <koch@w3development.de>
- Date: Thu, 09 Feb 2006 16:57:15 +0100
- To: w3c-wai-gl@w3.org
Gregg Vanderheiden wrote:
> The problem is
>
> 1. the images don't pass our guidelines
> 2. if you make any kind of claim for your site (or any URI pattern) it
> would include the URI's for the images etc (unless you stored the images off
> in some remote location)
>
> This is not what we intend. After looking at this for awhile Ben and John
> and I are suggesting that perhaps we focus on the delivery unit you get from
> a user request and not the subsequent delivery units that are fetched as
> part of it. To do this we would need to define a new entity.
[...]
> Web Unit (e.g. Page)
>
> A collection of information, consisting of one or more resources,
> intended to be rendered together, and identified by a single Uniform
> Resource Identifier (URLs etc.).
I don't see how this would solve the problems. To be honest, I don't see
a difference.
A delivery unit (as it seems to be the understanding of the DI WG) is a
collection of resources with one "primary" resource and 0 or more
"additional" resources, that are fetched by a user agent after fetching
the primary resource without activation by the user (in XLink terms:
xlink:actuate="onLoad").
Don't you define the "Web Unit" to be exactly this?
--
Johannes Koch
Spem in alium nunquam habui praeter in te, Deus Israel.
(Thomas Tallis, 40-part motet)
Received on Thursday, 9 February 2006 15:57:51 UTC